[ONNX][Draft] Introduce 'Functionalization' for torchscript exporter #98246
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
[ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/98246
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❗ 1 Active SEVsThere are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below: ✅ No FailuresAs of commit 7afbd38: This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
…t exporter" This is a quick attempt to utilize `torch.func.functionalize` for torchscript based onnx exporter. So far it works for the simple mutation test case, but one would expect a lot of issues and edge cases with more complicated models. I will likely not follow up on this to completion, but feel free to use this PR as a starting point if you found this an interesting feature to add! [ghstack-poisoned]
…t exporter" This is a quick attempt to utilize `torch.func.functionalize` for torchscript based onnx exporter. So far it works for the simple mutation test case, but one would expect a lot of issues and edge cases with more complicated models. I will ~~likely~~ not follow up on this to completion, but feel free to use this PR as a starting point if you found this an interesting feature to add! [ghstack-poisoned]
…t exporter" This is a quick attempt to utilize `torch.func.functionalize` for torchscript based onnx exporter. So far it works for the simple mutation test case, but one would expect a lot of issues and edge cases with more complicated models. I will ~~likely~~ not follow up on this to completion, but feel free to use this PR as a starting point if you found this an interesting feature to add! [ghstack-poisoned]
…t exporter" This is a quick attempt to utilize `torch.func.functionalize` for torchscript based onnx exporter. So far it works for the simple mutation test case, but one would expect a lot of issues and edge cases with more complicated models. I will ~~likely~~ not follow up on this to completion, but feel free to use this PR as a starting point if you found this an interesting feature to add! [ghstack-poisoned]
…alization' for torchscript exporter" This is a quick attempt to utilize `torch.func.functionalize` for torchscript based onnx exporter. So far it works for the simple mutation test case, but one would expect a lot of issues and edge cases with more complicated models. I will ~~likely~~ not follow up on this to completion, but feel free to use this PR as a starting point if you found this an interesting feature to add! [ghstack-poisoned]
|
Looks like this PR hasn't been updated in a while so we're going to go ahead and mark this as |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
This is a quick attempt to utilize
torch.func.functionalizefor torchscript basedonnx exporter. So far it works for the simple mutation test case, but one would
expect a lot of issues and edge cases with more complicated models. I will
likelynot follow up on this to completion, but feel free to use this PR as a starting point if
you found this an interesting feature to add!