But then it is easier to hate… Why do we have to make it so complicated by acknowledging it isn’t so simple?

Everyone else is just 100% morally wrong unlike me. ｡°(°¯᷄◠¯᷅°)°｡

You are working backwards to find the answer you want to just simplify people into being as bad as you want them to be.

Don’t just take the easy lazy logic or you will dirty yourself too into looking as racist and misogynistic yourself by saying those words aloud for others.

We have 2 years to find a candidate who doesnt try to fix systemic and financial issues with changing social structures.

Same energy

Money. He brags about he is good at getting it like he was a fiscal conservative.

No, its that people like you that don’t want to know anything else still are hearing about a fraction of the efforts.
The fact that despite your best efforts of being ignorant you, and people like you are being clued into the conversation even if just to try to troll it down means it is at least reaching the basement dwellers. And that implies a pretty long reach.

Grok: Hold on let me get more context

Grok: I wish I hadn't

Ah, Another microwaved meal of an ad.

You are responding right now. The conversation is being had. You hear plenty.

If you are lucky… One of the WereButts.

Bojack Horseman.

So I guess I get paid to be miserable and destroy my own life… Well at least I will get paid for it now.

This won’t fix your slumping sales Nintendo

Why is a shock that I don’t want pedophiles and corrupt backwater deal people running my country?

Oh, no. As the scientists of the Smithsonian put it,
“scientists think the house cat is only domestic when it wants to be”

Your lack of awareness does not extend to everyone else and you seem to be waiting for others to do enough work to give you an easy candidate that already has everything figured out.

Well we are trying so you can stop complaining and ignore us till we do then. I do not need nor care for your input or lack of effort.

I disagree. Not about the party loyalty to republicans but to the idea that people drop leaders for some perceived purity test.
I think it is a useful myth that excuses the behavior without looking into it more.

People want leaders that support and help them the individual. We are focusing on social ideology instead of financial which is the primary driving factor for Republican voters too. They are just more communal and expect members of their perceived community to be helpful to them and are taught to leave it to a higher power to solve.

Anyways, the Democratic party is not picking policy that is big tent. They are picking stuff that is hyper specific sub groups based on cultural aspects and invites awareness of whether you are in or not. It makes it appear fractured cause we are rallied as sub cultures under a fiscal conservative umbrella. If the policies were pushed as supporting the financially underserved it would be easier to recognize yourself as belonging but it would impact the financial support of billionaires which the party actually courts.

It appears we can’t win cause we are trying to play the same policies the republicans do under a guise of social structures need to be fixed instead of financial ones. Push for policies that are big tent and makes it easy to the average person to see them belonging in (poor) and thr support will come but the policies will need to change to. So which comes first?
It needs to be politicians cause no one will trust to elect the other way around.

You did a bad job of challenging or conversing. You have been singular sided the whole time.

You are toxic, at least specifically to this entire thread so far. And I am plenty happy to add to that so you maybe hear it.

I like trying to simplify stuff to basic language and I am happy it was helpful

Wider open you let in more light, and want faster shutter speed, more closed you get less light and want a longer shutter speed.

And f stops work backwards. Think of it as percent of sensor covered. The bigger the number the more covered it is and the smaller the hole/aperture.