Skip to content

Conversation

@fbac
Copy link
Collaborator

@fbac fbac commented Mar 28, 2025

Update artifacts to version 0.3.0 and upgrade embedded bytecode version strings to 5.0.0

  • Updates build-info.json with new build date and version tag v0.3.0
  • Updates embedded version strings to 5.0.0 in contract bytecode files for GroupMessageBroadcaster, IdentityUpdateBroadcaster, and RateRegistry contracts
  • Modifies bytecode for NodeRegistry contract

📍Where to Start

Start with build-info.json to verify the version and build date changes, then review the bytecode changes in GroupMessageBroadcaster.bin.json and other contract files.


Macroscope summarized 9d2e03f.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Updated build metadata to reflect the new release date and version tag.
  • Refactor

    • Refreshed multiple core components to enhance system performance, stability, and scalability.

@fbac fbac requested a review from a team as a code owner March 28, 2025 17:41
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 28, 2025

Walkthrough

The update revises the build metadata in artifacts/build-info.json by updating the build_date and build_tag fields. Additionally, the bytecode for multiple smart contracts—specifically GroupMessageBroadcaster, IdentityUpdateBroadcaster, NodeRegistry, and RateRegistry—has been completely replaced. No changes were made to the declarations of exported or public entities.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
artifacts/build-info.json Updated build_date from "2025-03-27T16:04:55Z" to "2025-03-28T17:40:51Z" and build_tag from "v0.2.2-26-gd771294" to "v0.3.0".
artifacts/bytecode/*.bin.json Complete replacement of bytecode for smart contracts (GroupMessageBroadcaster, IdentityUpdateBroadcaster, NodeRegistry, RateRegistry), indicating underlying implementation changes.

Poem

Hoppin' along through lines of code so fine,
I found new versions in each build design.
Bytecode reborn like carrots in spring,
With each update, my bunny heart sings.
A playful leap in digital delight,
I scurry on, coding under moonlight!


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 619ccc9 and 9d2e03f.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • artifacts/build-info.json (1 hunks)
  • artifacts/bytecode/GroupMessageBroadcaster.bin.json (1 hunks)
  • artifacts/bytecode/IdentityUpdateBroadcaster.bin.json (1 hunks)
  • artifacts/bytecode/NodeRegistry.bin.json (1 hunks)
  • artifacts/bytecode/RateRegistry.bin.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
artifacts/bytecode/GroupMessageBroadcaster.bin.json

[error] 1-1: String values must be double quoted.

(parse)

artifacts/bytecode/NodeRegistry.bin.json

[error] 1-1: String values must be double quoted.

(parse)

artifacts/bytecode/IdentityUpdateBroadcaster.bin.json

[error] 1-1: String values must be double quoted.

(parse)

artifacts/bytecode/RateRegistry.bin.json

[error] 1-1: String values must be double quoted.

(parse)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Slither
  • GitHub Check: Gas Report
  • GitHub Check: Code Coverage
🔇 Additional comments (5)
artifacts/build-info.json (1)

3-4: Build Metadata Update:
The build_date and build_tag fields have been updated to reflect the new release (v0.3.0). This change aligns with the coordinated update across the smart contract bytecode files. The JSON formatting is correct with all string values double quoted, so any static analysis message on this point can be safely ignored.

artifacts/bytecode/IdentityUpdateBroadcaster.bin.json (1)

1-2: Bytecode Overhaul – IdentityUpdateBroadcaster:
The entire bytecode for the IdentityUpdateBroadcaster contract has been completely replaced. This indicates a substantial update to the compiled contract. Please ensure that the new bytecode has been fully validated against the intended contract logic and that all on-chain tests and deployment procedures are updated accordingly. If static analysis flags any quoting issues, they are most likely false positives due to the auto-generated nature of these files.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 1-1: String values must be double quoted.

(parse)

artifacts/bytecode/RateRegistry.bin.json (1)

1-2: Bytecode Overhaul – RateRegistry:
The RateRegistry contract’s bytecode has been completely replaced. This update should match the new contract specifications. It is recommended to verify that all integration and deployment tests pass using the new bytecode. Any warnings regarding string quoting (e.g. “String values must be double quoted”) are likely false positives in the context of machine-generated hex output.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 1-1: String values must be double quoted.

(parse)

artifacts/bytecode/NodeRegistry.bin.json (1)

1-2: Bytecode Overhaul – NodeRegistry:
The bytecode for the NodeRegistry contract has been entirely replaced. This complete update should be confirmed against deployment criteria and integration tests to ensure that downstream interactions remain functional. The file structure adheres to the expected format, so static analysis reports about quotation marks can be dismissed as false positives.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 1-1: String values must be double quoted.

(parse)

artifacts/bytecode/GroupMessageBroadcaster.bin.json (1)

1-2: Bytecode Overhaul – GroupMessageBroadcaster:
The new bytecode for the GroupMessageBroadcaster contract is a full replacement of the previous version. This change is consistent with the overall version bump to v0.3.0 noted in the build metadata. Please verify that the new bytecode correctly implements the intended contract functionality and passes all relevant tests. Any static analysis alerts regarding string quoting in this auto-generated file should be considered benign.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 1-1: String values must be double quoted.

(parse)


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions
Copy link

LCOV of commit 9d2e03f during Solidity #81

Summary coverage rate:
  lines......: 96.5% (331 of 343 lines)
  functions..: 94.5% (86 of 91 functions)
  branches...: 92.9% (78 of 84 branches)

Files changed coverage rate: n/a

@fbac fbac merged commit fd8b6d7 into main Mar 28, 2025
11 checks passed
@fbac fbac deleted the 03-28-v0.3.0_artifacts branch March 30, 2025 17:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants