Added docs for proof_util module #460
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Davidson-Souza
requested changes
Apr 25, 2025
JoseSK999
suggested changes
Apr 25, 2025
JoseSK999
suggested changes
Apr 29, 2025
Co-authored-by: S \times 3 🗿 <[email protected]>
|
Thanks for the review! I also added a "`" mark on a few fields as they were throwing warnings during cargo doc execution. |
JoseSK999
approved these changes
Apr 30, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What is the purpose of this pull request?
Which crates are being modified?
Description
This PR aims to add missing docs for submodule
proof_util.It addresses #376
Notes to the reviewers
I have attached screenshots for the differences on the docs but notice I also added comments on private functions.
Checklist
just lintcargo testWas:
Is:
