Skip to content

Add .coderabbit.yaml #2322

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 1, 2025
Merged

Add .coderabbit.yaml #2322

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 1, 2025

Conversation

@arkid15r
Copy link
Collaborator

@arkid15r arkid15r commented Mar 1, 2025

Proposed change

Add .coderabbit.yaml

Type of change

  • New country/market holidays support (thank you!)
  • Supported country/market holidays update (calendar discrepancy fix, localization)
  • Existing code/documentation/test/process quality improvement (best practice, cleanup, refactoring, optimization)
  • Dependency update (version deprecation/pin/upgrade)
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Breaking change (a code change causing existing functionality to break)
  • New feature (new holidays functionality in general)

Checklist

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 1, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new configuration setup that enables automatic chat responses and generates code documentation in English.
    • Activated early access functionalities, including enhanced review settings for improved automation and summarization.
    • Added integration options for tooling checks with customizable timeout settings.
    • Included tone guidelines to ensure consistent, supportive communication.

Walkthrough

A new configuration file, .coderabbit.yaml, has been added. It introduces several configuration sections including settings for chat (auto_reply enabled), code generation (docstrings in en-US), early access mode, and reviews with multiple parameters (auto review, linked issues assessment, labeling options, and more). The file also sets tone instructions to ensure responses maintain a conversational yet spartan tone.

Changes

File Change Summary
.coderabbit.yaml Added new configuration sections: chat (auto_reply: true), code_generation (docstrings language: en-US), early_access (true), reviews (assess_linked_issues: true, auto_apply_labels: false, auto_review with drafts enabled, collapse_walkthrough: false, high_level_summary enabled, high_level_summary_in_walkthrough enabled, labeling_instructions as empty, poem: false, profile: assertive, request_changes_workflow: false, review_status: true, sequence_diagrams: false), tools (github-checks with timeout_ms: 300000), and tone_instructions (conversational spartan tone that is supportive).
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8060567 and 3a90fa4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 300000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Test build on windows-latest
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.coderabbit.yaml (6)

1-2: Validated Chat Configuration

The chat section correctly enables auto_reply as true. This is in line with the configuration schema and requires no changes.

3-5: Docstrings Language Setting Confirmed

The code_generation section sets the docstrings language to en-US. This complies with the schema enumeration and ensures generated docstrings are in the correct language.

6-7: Early Access and Language Settings Verified

The early_access flag is enabled and the global language is set to en-US. These settings are consistent with the schema and intended behavior.

8-22: Reviews Section Configuration Reviewed

The reviews configuration includes:

  • assess_linked_issues: true
  • auto_apply_labels: false
  • auto_review with enabled: true and drafts: true
  • collapse_walkthrough: false
  • high_level_summary: true and high_level_summary_in_walkthrough: true
  • An empty labeling_instructions array
  • poem: false
  • profile: assertive
  • request_changes_workflow: false
  • review_status: true
  • sequence_diagrams: false

All these settings align with the provided schema and the intended review process improvements.

23-25: GitHub-Checks Tool Timeout Configuration

Within the reviews.tools section, the github-checks sub-section correctly sets timeout_ms to 300000, which meets the maximum allowed value by the schema.

26-26: Tone Instructions Set Appropriately

The tone_instructions line clearly instructs to "Maintain a conversational spartan tone that is supportive in all responses." This aligns perfectly with our project ethos.

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 1, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (fed436e) to head (3a90fa4).
Report is 1 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               dev     #2322   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          201       201           
  Lines        12374     12374           
  Branches      1775      1775           
=========================================
  Hits         12374     12374

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

KJhellico
KJhellico previously approved these changes Mar 1, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@KJhellico KJhellico left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Let's try!

@arkid15r arkid15r enabled auto-merge March 1, 2025 22:12
@arkid15r arkid15r requested a review from KJhellico March 1, 2025 22:12
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Mar 1, 2025

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@arkid15r arkid15r added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 1, 2025
Merged via the queue into vacanza:dev with commit e49ab16 Mar 1, 2025
33 checks passed
@arkid15r arkid15r deleted the configure-coderabbit branch March 1, 2025 22:25
@arkid15r arkid15r mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@KJhellico KJhellico KJhellico approved these changes

@PPsyrius PPsyrius Awaiting requested review from PPsyrius PPsyrius is a code owner

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@arkid15r @KJhellico