Skip to content

Conversation

@gioboa
Copy link
Collaborator

@gioboa gioboa commented Sep 30, 2025

This GH action is not necessary anymore, let's remove it

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Removed the automation that marked and closed inactive issues and pull requests. Discussions will now remain open until manually triaged or closed by maintainers, reducing accidental closures and preserving context. No impact to application functionality or user experience.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 30, 2025

Walkthrough

Removed the GitHub Actions workflow .github/workflows/close-stale-issues.yml that previously auto-marked and closed stale issues/PRs using actions/stale@v10. No replacement workflow was added.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
CI Workflow Removal
\.github/workflows/close-stale-issues.yml
Deleted the "Close Stale Issues" workflow that ran actions/stale@v10 with configured permissions and messages for staling/closing issues and PRs.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • naorpeled
  • sgarner

Poem

A rabbit taps the CI keys, hop-hop—
The stale-bot’s whiskers take a stop.
No nightly nudge, no gentle poke,
The queue now breathes without the yoke.
Carrots saved, logs run light—
Burrow tidy, stars at night. 🥕✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The pull request title “ci: remove close stale issues GH action” succinctly follows conventional commit style by prefacing with “ci:” and clearly describes the primary change of deleting the GitHub Actions workflow that auto-closes stale issues. It directly reflects the modifications made in the .github/workflows/close-stale-issues.yml file and omits unnecessary details or noise. The title is specific enough for maintainers to quickly understand the intent without scanning the diff. This meets the guidelines for clarity, conciseness, and relevance.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch revert-11651-ci/stale-issues

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 925dee0 and 48e3548.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/close-stale-issues.yml (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/close-stale-issues.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (18)
  • GitHub Check: tests-linux (20) / sqljs
  • GitHub Check: tests-linux (20) / oracle
  • GitHub Check: tests-linux (20) / sqlite
  • GitHub Check: tests-linux (18) / sqljs
  • GitHub Check: tests-linux (18) / oracle
  • GitHub Check: tests-linux (18) / postgres (14)
  • GitHub Check: tests-linux (18) / sap
  • GitHub Check: tests-linux (18) / postgres (17)
  • GitHub Check: tests-linux (18) / mysql_mariadb
  • GitHub Check: tests-linux (18) / mssql
  • GitHub Check: tests-linux (18) / sqlite
  • GitHub Check: tests-linux (18) / mysql_mariadb_latest
  • GitHub Check: tests-linux (18) / mongodb
  • GitHub Check: tests-linux (18) / better-sqlite3
  • GitHub Check: tests-windows / sqljs
  • GitHub Check: tests-windows / sqlite
  • GitHub Check: tests-windows / better-sqlite3
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🧪 Early access (Sonnet 4.5): enabled

We are currently testing the Sonnet 4.5 model, which is expected to improve code review quality. However, this model may lead to increased noise levels in the review comments. Please disable the early access features if the noise level causes any inconvenience.

Note:

  • Public repositories are always opted into early access features.
  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages
Copy link

Deploying typeorm with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: 48e3548
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://fdb9e67b.typeorm.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://revert-11651-ci-stale-issues.typeorm.pages.dev

View logs

@alumni
Copy link
Collaborator

alumni commented Sep 30, 2025

@gioboa I wouldn't necessarily remove it - we could just tweak the message and allow 30 days for people to reply :)

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 76.431%. remained the same
when pulling 48e3548 on revert-11651-ci/stale-issues
into 925dee0 on master.

@gioboa gioboa requested review from naorpeled and sgarner September 30, 2025 16:55
@gioboa gioboa merged commit 2446bd0 into master Oct 1, 2025
67 checks passed
@gioboa gioboa deleted the revert-11651-ci/stale-issues branch October 1, 2025 10:52
ThbltLmr pushed a commit to ThbltLmr/typeorm that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants