Skip to content

Conversation

@jeverling
Copy link
Contributor

Hi all, based on issue #2566 and PR #2565 by @KenyaDonDraper, this PR adds this functionality plus a setting that enables this check (defaulting to false). This way, this functionality can be added without possibly affecting existing workflows.
I also added documentation and tests.

@jeverling jeverling requested review from a team and dlstadther as code owners May 30, 2022 11:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant