Skip to content

Conversation

@oscar-gross
Copy link
Contributor

Added Cloudwalk Testnet safe contract addresses.

Chain ID: 2008
RPC Endpoint: https://rpc.testnet.cloudwalk.io/
Block Explorer: https://explorer.testnet.cloudwalk.io/

@moisses89
Copy link
Member

moisses89 commented Aug 24, 2022

Hi @oscar-gross I tried to verify the deployment and seems that was not deployed, anyway it was deployed for me:

deploying "SimulateTxAccessor" (tx: 0xc0266574632e6d74daf1403667371c7afd05027136f86609056b058439ee4d40)...: deployed at 0x59AD6735bCd8152B84860Cb256dD9e96b85F69Da with 237871 gas
deploying "GnosisSafeProxyFactory" (tx: 0x7508ec71f32fec385059fdd98ad801961234e5596291f8f35f4449cf4b9d2d66)...: deployed at 0xa6B71E26C5e0845f74c812102Ca7114b6a896AB2 with 867594 gas
deploying "DefaultCallbackHandler" (tx: 0x6ac901cd2044fbdbf3bdf580ec9a2b7f699a5d26a352dafb662edf3cd415465c)...: deployed at 0x1AC114C2099aFAf5261731655Dc6c306bFcd4Dbd with 542473 gas
deploying "CompatibilityFallbackHandler" (tx: 0x2217ed533c706720d9d2846ca916b8e4b82a72d66eed8e2bd3d63014b06679a5)...: deployed at 0xf48f2B2d2a534e402487b3ee7C18c33Aec0Fe5e4 with 1238095 gas
deploying "CreateCall" (tx: 0x54054e0cdc2973480cd299ffc1ea567abe3bb22baa39a8eea8de51c870d3e68b)...: deployed at 0x7cbB62EaA69F79e6873cD1ecB2392971036cFAa4 with 294718 gas
deploying "MultiSend" (tx: 0x657c3fe3509a3b97e4de2fdfd77013d00aa688c9fcf63e7983f0bb538ad3cbc3)...: deployed at 0xA238CBeb142c10Ef7Ad8442C6D1f9E89e07e7761 with 190004 gas
deploying "MultiSendCallOnly" (tx: 0xc0cab362676583cef56a87758c2af813e0c986c51f5f5544841befd5dcfc50c4)...: deployed at 0x40A2aCCbd92BCA938b02010E17A5b8929b49130D with 142122 gas
deploying "SignMessageLib" (tx: 0x99be0200fdf5d1721e2619224e8904499d70de7083b4425953da7c0ec7fac58e)...: deployed at 0xA65387F16B013cf2Af4605Ad8aA5ec25a2cbA3a2 with 262353 gas
deploying "GnosisSafeL2" (tx: 0x5258a7091dec5561e14e7887d73ed1c9730071202ca0eb11a26512fdc2103bac)...: deployed at 0x3E5c63644E683549055b9Be8653de26E0B4CD36E with 5200241 gas
deploying "GnosisSafe" (tx: 0xad235534d6230779665926d80f43878ed8a3c7c34fd901789fe75dac7f10e4dc)...: deployed at 0xd9Db270c1B5E3Bd161E8c8503c55cEABeE709552 with 5017833 gas

I think that this could happen because when you deploy the contract didn't use the correct tag of safe-contracts

Current version: The latest release is v1.3.0-libs.0 on the commit 767ef36

Take a look to https://github.com/safe-global/safe-contracts#deploy

Then, update the addresses to the correct and I will review again, ping me when is ready.

@oscar-gross
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @moisses89 , it's updated
Thanks a lot for the help!

@moisses89 moisses89 merged commit 8dea757 into safe-global:main Aug 24, 2022
valens-carpentier pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants