Skip to content

Conversation

0xcadams
Copy link
Member

@0xcadams 0xcadams commented Oct 9, 2025

AGENTS.md is supported by many AI providers: https://agents.md/

See anthropics/claude-code#6235 for Claude Code compatibility.

@0xcadams 0xcadams requested review from arv and tantaman October 9, 2025 15:37
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 9, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
replicache-docs Ready Ready Preview Comment Oct 11, 2025 1:11am
zbugs Ready Ready Preview Oct 11, 2025 1:11am

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2025

🐰 Bencher Report

Branch0xcadams/agents-md
TestbedLinux
Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkFile SizeBenchmark Result
kilobytes (KB)
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
kilobytes (KB)
(Limit %)
zero-package.tgz📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
1,370.27 KB
(0.00%)Baseline: 1,370.27 KB
1,397.68 KB
(98.04%)
zero.js📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
225.67 KB
(0.00%)Baseline: 225.67 KB
230.19 KB
(98.04%)
zero.js.br📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
63.11 KB
(0.00%)Baseline: 63.11 KB
64.37 KB
(98.04%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2025

🐰 Bencher Report

Branch0xcadams/agents-md
Testbedself-hosted

🚨 1 Alert

BenchmarkMeasure
Units
ViewBenchmark Result
(Result Δ%)
Lower Boundary
(Limit %)
zql: (secondary index lookup) select * from track where album_id = 248Throughput
operations / second (ops/s) x 1e3
📈 plot
🚷 threshold
🚨 alert (🔔)
1.78 ops/s x 1e3
(-16.23%)Baseline: 2.13 ops/s x 1e3
1.87 ops/s x 1e3
(105.20%)

Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkThroughputBenchmark Result
operations / second (ops/s)
(Result Δ%)
Lower Boundary
operations / second (ops/s)
(Limit %)
zpg: (pk lookup) select * from track where id = 3163📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
876.87 ops/s
(-10.77%)Baseline: 982.70 ops/s
867.77 ops/s
(98.96%)
zpg: (secondary index lookup) select * from track where album_id = 248📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
1,032.46 ops/s
(-2.80%)Baseline: 1,062.15 ops/s
980.41 ops/s
(94.96%)
zpg: (table scan) select * from album📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
688.08 ops/s
(-1.78%)Baseline: 700.58 ops/s
631.52 ops/s
(91.78%)
zpg: OR with empty branch and limit📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
911.67 ops/s
(+0.81%)Baseline: 904.31 ops/s
818.21 ops/s
(89.75%)
zpg: OR with empty branch and limit with exists📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
755.02 ops/s
(-0.23%)Baseline: 756.73 ops/s
678.62 ops/s
(89.88%)
zpg: all playlists📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
5.63 ops/s
(+2.10%)Baseline: 5.51 ops/s
5.37 ops/s
(95.30%)
zpg: scan with one depth related📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
446.82 ops/s
(+4.62%)Baseline: 427.08 ops/s
408.85 ops/s
(91.50%)
zql: (pk lookup) select * from track where id = 3163📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
137,300.54 ops/s
(+10.84%)Baseline: 123,868.11 ops/s
109,519.80 ops/s
(79.77%)
zql: (secondary index lookup) select * from track where album_id = 248📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
🚨 view alert (🔔)
1,782.03 ops/s
(-16.23%)Baseline: 2,127.20 ops/s
1,874.63 ops/s
(105.20%)

zql: (table scan) select * from album📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
6,341.92 ops/s
(-3.83%)Baseline: 6,594.56 ops/s
6,326.07 ops/s
(99.75%)
zql: OR with empty branch and limit📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
58,412.15 ops/s
(+5.85%)Baseline: 55,183.94 ops/s
45,529.62 ops/s
(77.95%)
zql: OR with empty branch and limit with exists📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
11,877.92 ops/s
(-2.24%)Baseline: 12,150.63 ops/s
11,036.28 ops/s
(92.91%)
zql: all playlists📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
4.37 ops/s
(+2.42%)Baseline: 4.27 ops/s
4.02 ops/s
(91.96%)
zql: edit for limited query, inside the bound📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
213,852.99 ops/s
(-3.20%)Baseline: 220,913.87 ops/s
206,711.94 ops/s
(96.66%)
zql: edit for limited query, outside the bound📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
207,571.59 ops/s
(-4.86%)Baseline: 218,164.40 ops/s
194,171.37 ops/s
(93.54%)
zql: push into limited query, inside the bound📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
106,491.15 ops/s
(-2.93%)Baseline: 109,709.10 ops/s
106,253.71 ops/s
(99.78%)
zql: push into limited query, outside the bound📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
412,310.18 ops/s
(-4.65%)Baseline: 432,418.68 ops/s
403,296.84 ops/s
(97.81%)
zql: push into unlimited query📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
330,918.01 ops/s
(-1.99%)Baseline: 337,651.49 ops/s
316,701.74 ops/s
(95.70%)
zql: scan with one depth related📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
474.12 ops/s
(-0.64%)Baseline: 477.17 ops/s
451.28 ops/s
(95.18%)
zqlite: (pk lookup) select * from track where id = 3163📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
42,872.74 ops/s
(+0.85%)Baseline: 42,513.00 ops/s
40,889.20 ops/s
(95.37%)
zqlite: (secondary index lookup) select * from track where album_id = 248📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
9,972.33 ops/s
(-1.44%)Baseline: 10,117.66 ops/s
9,901.68 ops/s
(99.29%)
zqlite: (table scan) select * from album📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
1,336.37 ops/s
(+0.89%)Baseline: 1,324.55 ops/s
1,260.64 ops/s
(94.33%)
zqlite: OR with empty branch and limit📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
17,682.76 ops/s
(-2.08%)Baseline: 18,058.76 ops/s
17,377.15 ops/s
(98.27%)
zqlite: OR with empty branch and limit with exists📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
5,335.18 ops/s
(-1.15%)Baseline: 5,397.39 ops/s
5,161.89 ops/s
(96.75%)
zqlite: all playlists📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
1.41 ops/s
(+1.22%)Baseline: 1.40 ops/s
1.33 ops/s
(93.91%)
zqlite: edit for limited query, inside the bound📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
116,053.89 ops/s
(-1.79%)Baseline: 118,164.29 ops/s
111,605.50 ops/s
(96.17%)
zqlite: edit for limited query, outside the bound📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
120,537.20 ops/s
(-0.44%)Baseline: 121,074.18 ops/s
114,234.58 ops/s
(94.77%)
zqlite: push into limited query, inside the bound📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
3,898.13 ops/s
(+1.89%)Baseline: 3,825.98 ops/s
3,699.05 ops/s
(94.89%)
zqlite: push into limited query, outside the bound📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
148,644.58 ops/s
(+4.09%)Baseline: 142,809.40 ops/s
135,006.75 ops/s
(90.83%)
zqlite: push into unlimited query📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
130,851.47 ops/s
(+7.56%)Baseline: 121,657.62 ops/s
109,288.92 ops/s
(83.52%)
zqlite: scan with one depth related📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
162.54 ops/s
(-0.74%)Baseline: 163.74 ops/s
155.75 ops/s
(95.82%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2025

🐰 Bencher Report

Branch0xcadams/agents-md
Testbedself-hosted
Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkThroughputBenchmark Result
operations / second (ops/s) x 1e3
(Result Δ%)
Lower Boundary
operations / second (ops/s) x 1e3
(Limit %)
src/size-of-value.bench.ts > getSizeOfValue performance > arrays > large array (100 items)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
1,711.52 ops/s x 1e3
(+1.08%)Baseline: 1,693.31 ops/s x 1e3
1,626.86 ops/s x 1e3
(95.05%)
src/size-of-value.bench.ts > getSizeOfValue performance > arrays > small array (10 items)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
5,485.02 ops/s x 1e3
(+1.73%)Baseline: 5,391.96 ops/s x 1e3
5,144.52 ops/s x 1e3
(93.79%)
src/size-of-value.bench.ts > getSizeOfValue performance > datasets > large dataset (100x512B)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
67.75 ops/s x 1e3
(-11.16%)Baseline: 76.26 ops/s x 1e3
60.63 ops/s x 1e3
(89.49%)
src/size-of-value.bench.ts > getSizeOfValue performance > datasets > small dataset (10x256B)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
609.40 ops/s x 1e3
(-10.23%)Baseline: 678.84 ops/s x 1e3
552.39 ops/s x 1e3
(90.65%)
src/size-of-value.bench.ts > getSizeOfValue performance > objects > nested object📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
2,821.50 ops/s x 1e3
(-10.86%)Baseline: 3,165.27 ops/s x 1e3
2,767.57 ops/s x 1e3
(98.09%)
src/size-of-value.bench.ts > getSizeOfValue performance > objects > structured object (1KB)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
3,451.42 ops/s x 1e3
(-9.27%)Baseline: 3,803.92 ops/s x 1e3
3,207.90 ops/s x 1e3
(92.94%)
src/size-of-value.bench.ts > getSizeOfValue performance > objects > structured object (256B)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
3,402.17 ops/s x 1e3
(-9.65%)Baseline: 3,765.60 ops/s x 1e3
3,176.65 ops/s x 1e3
(93.37%)
src/size-of-value.bench.ts > getSizeOfValue performance > primitives > boolean📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
7,739.08 ops/s x 1e3
(+3.38%)Baseline: 7,486.27 ops/s x 1e3
7,101.54 ops/s x 1e3
(91.76%)
src/size-of-value.bench.ts > getSizeOfValue performance > primitives > integer📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
7,479.18 ops/s x 1e3
(-0.06%)Baseline: 7,483.64 ops/s x 1e3
7,133.60 ops/s x 1e3
(95.38%)
src/size-of-value.bench.ts > getSizeOfValue performance > primitives > null📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
7,607.93 ops/s x 1e3
(+0.94%)Baseline: 7,536.92 ops/s x 1e3
7,092.59 ops/s x 1e3
(93.23%)
src/size-of-value.bench.ts > getSizeOfValue performance > primitives > string (100 chars)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
1,153.26 ops/s x 1e3
(+3.28%)Baseline: 1,116.62 ops/s x 1e3
1,067.54 ops/s x 1e3
(92.57%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2025

🐰 Bencher Report

Branch0xcadams/agents-md
Testbedself-hosted
Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkThroughputBenchmark Result
operations / second (ops/s) x 1e3
(Result Δ%)
Lower Boundary
operations / second (ops/s) x 1e3
(Limit %)
src/client/custom.bench.ts > big schema📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
789.36 ops/s x 1e3
(-3.61%)Baseline: 818.90 ops/s x 1e3
645.30 ops/s x 1e3
(81.75%)
src/client/zero.bench.ts > basics > All 1000 rows x 10 columns (numbers)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
2.96 ops/s x 1e3
(+5.40%)Baseline: 2.81 ops/s x 1e3
2.66 ops/s x 1e3
(90.05%)
src/client/zero.bench.ts > pk compare > pk = N📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
42.82 ops/s x 1e3
(-0.97%)Baseline: 43.23 ops/s x 1e3
41.12 ops/s x 1e3
(96.04%)
src/client/zero.bench.ts > with filter > Lower rows 500 x 10 columns (numbers)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
4.22 ops/s x 1e3
(+0.87%)Baseline: 4.18 ops/s x 1e3
4.03 ops/s x 1e3
(95.50%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

@tantaman
Copy link
Contributor

CleanShot 2025-10-09 at 20 35 13@2x 🤔

@0xcadams
Copy link
Member Author

I think that was from me clicking the "Update branch" button? There's two commits, I can rebase if needed.

Screenshot 2025-10-09 at 6 23 17 PM

Copy link
Contributor

@arv arv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@0xcadams 0xcadams added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 10, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Oct 10, 2025
@0xcadams 0xcadams added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 10, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Oct 10, 2025
@0xcadams 0xcadams added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 10, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Oct 10, 2025
@0xcadams 0xcadams added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 10, 2025
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2025
AGENTS.md is supported by many AI providers: https://agents.md/

See anthropics/claude-code#6235 for Claude
Code compatibility.
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Oct 10, 2025
@0xcadams 0xcadams added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 10, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Oct 10, 2025
@0xcadams 0xcadams added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 10, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Oct 10, 2025
@0xcadams 0xcadams added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 10, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Oct 10, 2025
@0xcadams
Copy link
Member Author

Realizing this is failing due to types so waiting for upstream to fix. Can’t merge without that.

@0xcadams 0xcadams added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 10, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Oct 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants