-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.3k
Multioutput backward formula: allow conditional guards against saving #103750
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
dea1470
Multioutput backward formula: allow conditional guards against saving
nikitaved 1baea63
Update on "Multioutput backward formula: allow conditional guards aga…
nikitaved 49cba6c
Update on "Multioutput backward formula: allow conditional guards aga…
nikitaved 464ce22
Update on "Multioutput backward formula: allow conditional guards aga…
nikitaved c8ba31b
Update on "Multioutput backward formula: allow conditional guards aga…
nikitaved 847d30b
Update on "Multioutput backward formula: allow conditional guards aga…
nikitaved acc4c7b
Update on "Multioutput backward formula: allow conditional guards aga…
nikitaved f61a8c4
Update on "Multioutput backward formula: allow conditional guards aga…
nikitaved 89e2dac
Update on "Multioutput backward formula: allow conditional guards aga…
nikitaved fbdca25
Update on "Multioutput backward formula: allow conditional guards aga…
nikitaved 61cec74
Update on "Multioutput backward formula: allow conditional guards aga…
nikitaved af4aa6b
Update on "Multioutput backward formula: allow conditional guards aga…
nikitaved b76601a
Update on "Multioutput backward formula: allow conditional guards aga…
nikitaved File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For the context: this one is used in the next PR up in the stack for
sparse_sampled_addmm_backward
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If codegen did its job correctly, we would always get an undefined tensor t here right? Maybe we can assert for that here.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, not really, unfortunately. This code is being run at backward compute. But we can assert inside backward implementations for sure to test both conditions and savings.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh whoops, good point.