Skip to content

Conversation

cyyever
Copy link
Contributor

@cyyever cyyever commented Jul 22, 2025

Summary

This change is to make it possible to change PyTorch to use ::std::string_view in torchgen. Other standard types in the same file also use ::std namespace.

@cyyever cyyever requested a review from SS-JIA as a code owner July 22, 2025 15:50
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Jul 22, 2025
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jul 22, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/12706

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 1 New Failure, 1 Unrelated Failure

As of commit 3c2bbc4 with merge base 80250f8 (image):

NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

  • pull / test-binary-size-linux-gcc / linux-job (gh) (trunk failure)
    /pytorch/executorch/kernels/portable/cpu/op_stack.cpp:129:26: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘size_t’ {aka ‘long unsigned int’} and ‘ssize_t’ {aka ‘long int’} [-Werror=sign-compare]

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@cyyever
Copy link
Contributor Author

cyyever commented Jul 30, 2025

@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the release notes: none Do not include this in the release notes label Jul 30, 2025
@cyyever
Copy link
Contributor Author

cyyever commented Aug 14, 2025

Unrelated failures.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. release notes: none Do not include this in the release notes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants