Skip to content

Conversation

nickbp
Copy link
Contributor

@nickbp nickbp commented Feb 4, 2025

Both outputs are currently hardcoded to being enabled, this allows disabling one or the other. Defaults to both enabled to retain current behavior.

Larger clusters can save some etcd I/O by skipping one of these outputs if they aren't being consumed. In our case we aren't consuming the Events so writing them just creates more churn, for example if node problems are flapping.

Both outputs are currently hardcoded to being enabled, this allows disabling one or the other. Defaults to both enabled to retain current behavior.

Larger clusters can save some etcd I/O by skipping one of these outputs if they aren't being consumed. In our case we aren't consuming the Events so writing them just creates more churn.
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Feb 4, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from sjenning February 4, 2025 01:54
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @nickbp!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/node-problem-detector 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/node-problem-detector has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @nickbp. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 4, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@daveoy daveoy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀 looks good to me, seems useful

@wangzhen127
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Feb 6, 2025
@nickbp
Copy link
Contributor Author

nickbp commented Feb 10, 2025

CI looks like it's having problems with arm64 builds? amd64 completed successfully while arm64 failed with:

#26 [linux/arm64 builder 5/5] RUN GOARCH=arm64 make bin/node-problem-detector bin/health-checker bin/log-counter
[...]
#26 499.0 aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1

@wangzhen127
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 11, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: daveoy, nickbp, wangzhen127

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 11, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 01e1cf0 into kubernetes:master Mar 11, 2025
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants