Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 28, 2022

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
fs-extra ^10.1.0 -> ^11.0.0 age adoption passing confidence
@types/fs-extra (source) ^9.0.13 -> ^11.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

jprichardson/node-fs-extra

v11.1.0

Compare Source

  • Re-add main field to package.json for better TypeScript compatibility (#​979, #​981)

v11.0.0

Compare Source

Breaking Changes
  • Don't allow requiring fs-extra/lib/SOMETHING (switched to exports) (#​974)
  • Require Node v14.14+ (#​968, #​969)
New Features
  • Add fs-extra/esm for ESM named export support; see docs for details (#​746, #​974)
  • Add promise support for fs.readv() (#​970)
Bugfixes

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update dependency fs-extra to v11 Update dependency fs-extra to v11 Dec 17, 2022
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency fs-extra to v11 fix(deps): update dependency fs-extra to v11 Dec 17, 2022
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/fs-extra-11.x branch from 7021455 to 383725e Compare January 9, 2023 01:29
@jaywcjlove jaywcjlove merged commit 2092a95 into main Feb 23, 2023
@jaywcjlove jaywcjlove deleted the renovate/fs-extra-11.x branch February 23, 2023 02:59
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2023
Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> 2092a95
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants