Skip to content

Conversation

ReneWerner87
Copy link
Member

Summary

  • reuse Bind objects via sync.Pool with AcquireBind/ReleaseBind
  • release Bind from context lifecycle
  • test bind pooling behavior

Testing

  • make test

https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_6891a51dad34832688a090fd9490d4eb

@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings August 5, 2025 06:50
@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 requested a review from a team as a code owner August 5, 2025 06:50
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 5, 2025

Walkthrough

A sync.Pool was introduced to manage reusable Bind struct instances, with new AcquireBind and ReleaseBind functions for allocation and cleanup. The Bind struct now has a release method to reset its fields. DefaultCtx now acquires/recycles Bind instances using these new mechanisms, and a new test validates the pooling and reset logic.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Bind Pooling Implementation
bind.go
Added a sync.Pool (bindPool) for Bind instances, with AcquireBind/ReleaseBind functions and a Bind.release() method for resetting.
Bind Pooling Integration
ctx.go
Modified DefaultCtx to use AcquireBind/ReleaseBind for managing its bind field, ensuring proper reset and reuse of Bind instances.
Pooling Test
bind_test.go
Added a test verifying that Bind instances are reset correctly after being released and reacquired from the pool.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Test as Test
    participant Pool as bindPool
    participant Bind as Bind

    Test->>Pool: AcquireBind()
    Pool-->>Test: Bind instance
    Test->>Bind: Modify fields
    Test->>Pool: ReleaseBind(Bind)
    Pool->>Bind: Bind.release()
    Test->>Pool: AcquireBind()
    Pool-->>Test: (possibly same) Bind instance (reset)
    Test->>Bind: Assert fields reset
    Test->>Pool: ReleaseBind(Bind)
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~15 minutes

Poem

A pool for Binds, so neat and spry,
Hops in, hops out, the structs just fly.
Reset and reused, they’re fresh as dew,
With tests to prove their fields renew.
In code we leap, in pools we trust—
Efficient rabbits, never a bust! 🐇✨

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7e2a748 and 2bdad9f.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • bind.go (2 hunks)
  • bind_test.go (1 hunks)
  • ctx.go (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (11)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: efectn
PR: gofiber/fiber#3162
File: app_test.go:893-895
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T12:37:27.581Z
Learning: In the `Test_App_ShutdownWithContext` function in `app_test.go`, the `clientDone` channel is used to synchronize the client's request completion before proceeding, eliminating the need for additional `time.Sleep` calls.
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#3016
File: middleware/session/session.go:46-61
Timestamp: 2024-10-02T23:02:12.306Z
Learning: In this codebase, the `sessionPool` only contains `Session` instances, so type assertions without additional checks are acceptable.
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#3016
File: middleware/session/session.go:46-61
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T19:06:06.583Z
Learning: In this codebase, the `sessionPool` only contains `Session` instances, so type assertions without additional checks are acceptable.
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#3051
File: middleware/session/session.go:215-216
Timestamp: 2024-06-30T00:38:06.580Z
Learning: The `session.Save()` method in the `middleware/session` package returns the `Session` back to `sync.Pool`.
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#3051
File: middleware/session/session.go:215-216
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T19:06:06.583Z
Learning: The `session.Save()` method in the `middleware/session` package returns the `Session` back to `sync.Pool`.
📚 Learning: in fiber, the `c.set` method does not return an error....
Learnt from: sigmundxia
PR: gofiber/fiber#3151
File: middleware/adaptor/adaptor_test.go:226-230
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T19:06:06.583Z
Learning: In Fiber, the `c.Set` method does not return an error.

Applied to files:

  • bind.go
📚 Learning: in `defaulterrorhandler(c *fiber.ctx, err error)`, since `c` is a pointer to an interface, we need t...
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#3016
File: middleware/session/config.go:122-122
Timestamp: 2024-09-25T16:18:34.719Z
Learning: In `DefaultErrorHandler(c *fiber.Ctx, err error)`, since `c` is a pointer to an interface, we need to dereference `*c` when calling interface methods like `SendStatus`.

Applied to files:

  • bind.go
📚 Learning: in the gofiber/fiber framework, service startup failures should panic rather than allowing the appli...
Learnt from: mdelapenya
PR: gofiber/fiber#3434
File: app.go:623-636
Timestamp: 2025-05-08T08:14:37.302Z
Learning: In the gofiber/fiber framework, service startup failures should panic rather than allowing the application to continue running with degraded functionality, as this is the agreed-upon design decision.

Applied to files:

  • bind.go
📚 Learning: in the fiber framework, breaking changes are acceptable when moving from version 2 to version 3, inc...
Learnt from: ReneWerner87
PR: gofiber/fiber#3161
File: app.go:923-932
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T07:56:21.623Z
Learning: In the Fiber framework, breaking changes are acceptable when moving from version 2 to version 3, including modifications to method signatures such as in the `Test` method in `app.go`.

Applied to files:

  • bind.go
  • bind_test.go
📚 Learning: in documentation files for the fiber framework, code examples are often partial and don't repeat imp...
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#3446
File: docs/middleware/logger.md:44-44
Timestamp: 2025-05-13T00:19:16.407Z
Learning: In documentation files for the Fiber framework, code examples are often partial and don't repeat import statements that were shown in earlier examples, focusing instead on demonstrating specific usage patterns.

Applied to files:

  • bind.go
📚 Learning: in the `middleware/adaptor/adaptor.go` file of the fiber framework, when updating context handling, ...
Learnt from: gaby
PR: gofiber/fiber#3193
File: middleware/adaptor/adaptor.go:111-111
Timestamp: 2024-11-10T23:44:13.704Z
Learning: In the `middleware/adaptor/adaptor.go` file of the Fiber framework, when updating context handling, replacing `c.Context()` with `c.RequestCtx()` is appropriate to access the `fasthttp.RequestCtx`.

Applied to files:

  • bind.go
📚 Learning: in go test files, prefer using the `require` methods from the `testify` package for assertions inste...
Learnt from: efectn
PR: gofiber/fiber#3162
File: hooks_test.go:228-228
Timestamp: 2024-12-13T08:14:22.851Z
Learning: In Go test files, prefer using the `require` methods from the `testify` package for assertions instead of manual comparisons and calls to `t.Fatal` or `t.Fatalf`.

Applied to files:

  • bind_test.go
📚 Learning: unit tests in this project use testify require....
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#3016
File: middleware/session/store.go:164-167
Timestamp: 2024-10-02T23:03:31.727Z
Learning: Unit tests in this project use testify require.

Applied to files:

  • bind_test.go
📚 Learning: the project uses the testify/assert package for assertions in unit tests....
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#2922
File: middleware/cors/utils.go:63-71
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T19:06:06.583Z
Learning: The project uses the testify/assert package for assertions in unit tests.

Applied to files:

  • bind_test.go
📚 Learning: in the fiber framework, `context()` is being renamed to `requestctx()`, and `usercontext()` to `cont...
Learnt from: gaby
PR: gofiber/fiber#3193
File: middleware/cache/cache_test.go:897-897
Timestamp: 2024-11-08T04:10:42.990Z
Learning: In the Fiber framework, `Context()` is being renamed to `RequestCtx()`, and `UserContext()` to `Context()` to improve clarity and align with Go's context conventions.

Applied to files:

  • ctx.go
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (5)
  • GitHub Check: Compare
  • GitHub Check: unit (1.24.x, macos-13)
  • GitHub Check: Analyse
  • GitHub Check: repeated
  • GitHub Check: unit (1.24.x, windows-latest)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
bind.go (5)

4-7: LGTM: Necessary imports added.

The errors and sync imports are required for the new pooling functionality.


25-31: LGTM: Proper sync.Pool initialization.

The pool correctly initializes Bind instances with dontHandleErrs: true, which matches the default behavior for error handling.


40-48: LGTM: Proper pool acquisition with appropriate error handling.

The function correctly retrieves and type-asserts the Bind instance from the pool. The panic on type assertion failure is appropriate here as it would indicate a serious programming error, consistent with similar patterns in the codebase.


50-54: LGTM: Proper pool release pattern.

The function correctly resets the Bind instance before returning it to the pool, ensuring proper cleanup for reuse.


56-60: LGTM: Proper field reset for pooling.

The release method correctly resets all fields to their default values:

  • ctx to nil (no context reference)
  • dontHandleErrs to true (default error handling behavior)
  • skipValidation to false (enable validation by default)
ctx.go (2)

448-451: LGTM: Proper integration with bind pooling.

The conditional release properly returns the Bind instance to the pool before cleanup, ensuring efficient resource reuse.


498-502: LGTM: Proper bind acquisition and context assignment.

The method correctly acquires a Bind instance from the pool and properly sets its context reference. This maintains the existing API while utilizing the new pooling mechanism for better performance.

bind_test.go (1)

35-48: LGTM: Comprehensive pooling mechanism test.

The test properly validates that:

  • AcquireBind() returns a usable instance
  • ReleaseBind() properly resets all fields via the release() method
  • Subsequent acquisitions return instances with default values

The test coverage is thorough and follows the project's testing conventions using testify/require.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/2025-08-05-06-50-39

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @ReneWerner87, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request optimizes the allocation and deallocation of Bind objects by introducing a sync.Pool for their reuse. This change aims to reduce memory pressure and improve performance by minimizing garbage collection overhead associated with frequently created Bind instances, while also integrating this pooling mechanism seamlessly into the Fiber context lifecycle.

Highlights

  • Performance Optimization: Implemented sync.Pool for Bind objects to reduce memory allocations and garbage collection pressure, thereby improving application performance by reusing instances.
  • New Helper Functions: Introduced AcquireBind() and ReleaseBind() functions to manage the lifecycle of Bind objects, allowing them to be efficiently retrieved from and returned to the object pool.
  • Context Integration: Integrated the Bind object pooling into the DefaultCtx lifecycle. Bind objects are now acquired from the pool when c.Bind() is called and released back to the pool when the context is reset via c.release().
  • Test Coverage: Added a new test case (Test_AcquireReleaseBind) to verify the correct behavior of Bind object pooling, including the proper resetting of object state upon release and re-acquisition.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds object pooling for Bind instances to improve memory allocation efficiency by reusing Bind objects rather than creating new ones for each request.

Key changes:

  • Introduces sync.Pool-based pooling with AcquireBind/ReleaseBind functions
  • Integrates bind release into the context lifecycle cleanup
  • Adds comprehensive test coverage for the pooling behavior

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File Description
bind.go Implements sync.Pool for Bind objects with acquire/release functions and state reset logic
ctx.go Updates Bind() method to use pooled instances and adds bind cleanup to release() method
bind_test.go Adds test to verify proper pooling behavior and state reset

b, ok := bindPool.Get().(*Bind)
if !ok {
panic(errors.New("failed to type-assert to *Bind"))
}
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI Aug 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The type assertion failure should never occur with a properly configured sync.Pool. Consider using a direct type assertion without the ok check since the Pool.New function guarantees the correct type, or log the error instead of panicking to avoid crashing the application.

Suggested change
}
b := bindPool.Get().(*Bind)

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

}
c.bind.ctx = c
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI Aug 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The ctx field is set on every call to Bind() even when c.bind is already initialized. Consider moving this assignment inside the nil check to avoid unnecessary assignment when the bind object is already configured.

Suggested change
c.bind.ctx = c
c.bind.ctx = c
}

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 5, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 91.30435% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 91.84%. Comparing base (7e2a748) to head (2bdad9f).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
bind.go 88.23% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3660      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.82%   91.84%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         113      113              
  Lines       11425    11443      +18     
==========================================
+ Hits        10491    10510      +19     
+ Misses        670      669       -1     
  Partials      264      264              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 91.84% <91.30%> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a sync.Pool for Bind objects to reduce allocations, which is a great performance optimization. The implementation is solid and follows the correct patterns for using sync.Pool. The integration with the Ctx lifecycle is also done correctly. I have a couple of suggestions for minor improvements to make the code more idiomatic and slightly more efficient. Overall, great work!

Comment on lines +42 to +45
b, ok := bindPool.Get().(*Bind)
if !ok {
panic(errors.New("failed to type-assert to *Bind"))
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The type assertion from sync.Pool.Get() can be simplified. A single-value type assertion will panic if the type is incorrect, which is the same behavior as the current code. The panic message from the Go runtime is often more descriptive as it includes the actual type that was found, which can be more helpful for debugging.

Suggested change
b, ok := bindPool.Get().(*Bind)
if !ok {
panic(errors.New("failed to type-assert to *Bind"))
}
b := bindPool.Get().(*Bind)

Comment on lines +499 to +501
c.bind = AcquireBind()
}
c.bind.ctx = c
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

For efficiency, the c.bind.ctx assignment should only happen when a new Bind object is acquired. It can be moved inside the if block to avoid redundant assignments on subsequent calls to Bind() within the same request lifecycle.

	if c.bind == nil {
		c.bind = AcquireBind()
		c.bind.ctx = c
	}

Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️

Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.50.

Benchmark suite Current: 2bdad9f Previous: 7e2a748 Ratio
Benchmark_Ctx_Links - B/op 1 B/op 0 B/op +∞
BenchmarkAppendMsgitem-4_middleware_csrf - MB/s 3200.61 MB/s 1573.79 MB/s 2.03
BenchmarkAppendMsgstorageManager 0.6235 ns/op 1603.74 MB/s 0 B/op 0 allocs/op 0.3117 ns/op 3208.43 MB/s 0 B/op 0 allocs/op 2.00
BenchmarkAppendMsgstorageManager - ns/op 0.6235 ns/op 0.3117 ns/op 2.00
BenchmarkAppendMsgdata 0.6226 ns/op 1606.05 MB/s 0 B/op 0 allocs/op 0.3112 ns/op 3213.69 MB/s 0 B/op 0 allocs/op 2.00
BenchmarkAppendMsgdata - ns/op 0.6226 ns/op 0.3112 ns/op 2.00

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 merged commit 059b161 into main Aug 5, 2025
17 of 21 checks passed
@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 deleted the codex/2025-08-05-06-50-39 branch August 5, 2025 07:27
@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 added this to the v3 milestone Aug 5, 2025
@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 added this to v3 Aug 5, 2025
@gaby gaby added the v3 label Aug 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: No status
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants