🧹 chore: Add tests for quoteRawString #3613
Conversation
WalkthroughA new parallelized test function, Changes
Estimated code review effort1 (<30 minutes) Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used🧠 Learnings (2)📓 Common learningshelpers_test.go (6)Learnt from: ReneWerner87 Learnt from: efectn Learnt from: sixcolors Learnt from: efectn Learnt from: sixcolors Learnt from: sixcolors 🔇 Additional comments (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @gaby, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request primarily focuses on enhancing the test coverage and reliability of the quoteRawString utility function by introducing a new, comprehensive test suite. The aim is to ensure that the function correctly processes and quotes various string inputs, including complex and edge cases, thereby improving the overall robustness of string manipulation operations.
Highlights
- New Test Case: A new comprehensive test function,
Test_App_quoteRawString, has been added tohelpers_test.go. This test is designed to validate the behavior of theapp.quoteRawStringutility function. - Test Coverage Enhancement: The newly added test employs a table-driven approach, covering a wide range of input scenarios for
quoteRawString. This includes empty strings, simple strings, and strings containing special characters such as backslashes, quotes, newlines, carriage returns, and various control characters, ensuring robust handling of diverse inputs. - Concurrency in Testing: The test utilizes
t.Parallel()to allow for concurrent execution of individual test cases, which can improve overall test suite performance.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The new test function Test_App_quoteRawString provides good coverage for the quoteRawString helper.
I've found a couple of issues in the implementation of the test:
- A potential race condition due to incorrect handling of the loop variable in a parallel sub-test. This is a common Go pitfall.
- A minor performance issue where
app.New()is called repeatedly inside a loop.
I've left detailed comments with suggestions on how to address these. Please take a look.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3613 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.97% 91.07% +0.09%
==========================================
Files 112 112
Lines 11262 11262
==========================================
+ Hits 10246 10257 +11
+ Misses 762 750 -12
- Partials 254 255 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️
Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.50.
| Benchmark suite | Current: 2c6662a | Previous: 7da5603 | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark_GenericParseTypeString/benchmark_genericParseTypeString |
13.95 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op |
8.468 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op |
1.65 |
Benchmark_GenericParseTypeString/benchmark_genericParseTypeString - ns/op |
13.95 ns/op |
8.468 ns/op |
1.65 |
This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR adds comprehensive test coverage for the quoteRawString method by implementing a table-driven test that validates string quoting and escaping behavior across various input scenarios.
- Adds a new test function
Test_App_quoteRawStringwith parallel execution - Implements table-driven testing approach covering edge cases like empty strings, special characters, control characters, and mixed content
- Ensures proper escaping validation for backslashes, quotes, newlines, carriage returns, and control characters
Summary