Fix an issue where updating a Cloud Function that retires would add incorrect fields to the updateMask #8560
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ssing between retries
taeold
approved these changes
May 13, 2025
Co-authored-by: Daniel Lee <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
During a deployment we add
buildEnvironmentVariablesto the Cloud Function on Creates/Updates. If the Update operation fails, then we'll retry using the same Cloud Function reference. This reference contains the new fields which the field mask on the retry to contain allbuildEnvironmentVariables.$VAR. These are not recognized on the Cloud Functions API and will return a 400 -The updateMask field contains fields not existing in CloudFunction resource.