allow scrolling details pager from list pane #112
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @dhth, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the user experience by introducing a suite of new keybindings that enable direct control over the details pane's scrolling behavior from the list pane. This allows for more fluid navigation and content consumption, eliminating the need to constantly switch focus between panes to view lengthy details or help information. The changes include capabilities for line-by-line, half-page, and top/bottom scrolling, all accessible without leaving the list view. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces new keybindings for scrolling the details pane while the list pane is active, and for navigating to the top or bottom of lists and viewports. The changes are clearly documented in both the changelog and the help text. My review identified a few implementation issues: the 'g' and 'G' keybindings are not fully implemented as per their documentation, and the new 'ctrl+u' keybinding behaves inconsistently across different views compared to 'ctrl+d'. I have provided specific code suggestions to address these points, which will complete the features and improve the overall consistency of the user interface.
No description provided.