-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 2
add scan command #90
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add scan command #90
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @dhth, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request significantly enhances the application's data processing capabilities by introducing a new scan command. This command empowers users to efficiently extract and save Kafka topic records to local files, offering various output formats and advanced filtering options. The changes also include a refactoring of the Kafka client initialization to support these new consumption patterns, making the system more robust and adaptable.
Highlights
- New Scan Command: Introduces a powerful new CLI command, "scan", allowing users to extract and save Kafka topic records to local files.
- Flexible Output Formats: The new scan command supports writing records to local files in various formats, including CSV, JSONL, and plain text, inferred from the output file extension.
- Advanced Record Filtering: Users can now filter Kafka records by key using regular expressions, providing more precise data extraction capabilities.
- Configurable Consumption Start: The scan command allows specifying a starting offset or timestamp for record consumption, enabling targeted data retrieval from Kafka topics.
- Kafka Client Refactoring: The internal Kafka client creation logic has been refactored using a builder pattern, improving flexibility and supporting different consumption scenarios (e.g., consumer group vs. direct offset/timestamp consumption).
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new scan command, which is a valuable addition for inspecting Kafka topics. The refactoring of the Kafka client creation into a builder pattern is a great improvement for code maintainability. However, I've identified a few issues that need attention. There's a critical issue with conflicting command-line short flags that will prevent the application from starting. I also found a high-severity resource leak due to improper use of defer within a loop, and a few medium-severity issues related to an unused flag, duplicated code, and buggy reporting logic. I've provided detailed comments and suggestions to address these points.
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new scan command, which is a great addition for inspecting topic contents. The implementation is well-structured, with good use of goroutines for progress display and signal handling for graceful shutdown. The refactoring to introduce a builder pattern for the Kafka client and to centralize file system logic significantly improves the codebase. I've identified a few critical issues related to error handling that could lead to silent data loss, particularly around file I/O and process interruption. I've also included some suggestions to improve code clarity and robustness. Overall, this is a solid contribution.
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new scan command, which is a great addition for inspecting topic contents. The implementation is solid, with good handling of signals for graceful shutdown and a nice progress indicator. The refactoring in the internal/kafka package to use a builder pattern for the client is a significant improvement to the codebase.
My review includes a few suggestions to improve maintainability by reducing code duplication, and a couple of high-severity fixes related to error handling and potential data loss in the new scan functionality. Overall, great work on this feature.
No description provided.