Skip to content

Conversation

jpvajda
Copy link
Contributor

@jpvajda jpvajda commented Jul 2, 2025

Proposed changes

This PR implements two new features for the Deepgram .NET SDK Agent WebSocket client:

2. Speak Provider Array Configuration

Enhances the Agent Speak configuration to support multiple TTS providers in array format while maintaining full backward compatibility with existing single provider configurations. This allows for more flexible fallback scenarios and multi-provider TTS setups.

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce to the community .NET SDK?

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation update or tests (if none of the other choices apply)

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
  • I have lint'ed all of my code using repo standards
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate)

Further comments

Implementation Approach

Speak Array Configuration:

  • Designed for maximum backward compatibility - existing code continues to work unchanged
  • New SpeakProviders property takes precedence when set, allowing array configurations
  • Individual SpeakProviderConfig objects can have their own provider settings and endpoints
  • JSON serialization properly handles both single and array formats

Testing Coverage

Comprehensive test suites added:

  • AgentSpeakTests.cs: 8 tests for Speak array configuration

Test scenarios include:

  • Backward compatibility verification
  • Input validation (null/empty strings)
  • Schema validation and JSON serialization
  • Array format support and structure validation
  • Mixed provider configurations with different endpoints

JSON Format Examples

Speak Array Configuration:

{
  "agent": {
    "speak": [
      {"provider": {"type": "deepgram", "model": "aura-2-zeus-en"}},
      {"provider": {"type": "open_ai", "model": "tts-1", "voice": "shimmer"}, "endpoint": {...}}
    ]
  }
}

Verification Steps

  1. Build Verification: dotnet build - All projects compile successfully
  2. Test Verification: dotnet test - All 135 tests pass (18 new tests added)
  3. Backward Compatibility: Existing Speak configurations continue to work unchanged
  4. New Features: Both InjectUserMessage and Speak arrays function as specified

Known Issues

None. All tests pass and backward compatibility is maintained.

Breaking Changes

None. This is a purely additive change that maintains full backward compatibility.

Types of changes

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation update or tests (if none of the other choices apply)

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
  • I have lint'ed all of my code using repo standards
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added support for configuring multiple TTS providers for agent speech, allowing selection of several providers in addition to the existing single-provider option.
    • Updated documentation with examples for multi-provider speech configuration, including fallback setup for enhanced reliability.
  • Tests

    • Introduced comprehensive unit tests to validate both single and multi-provider configurations, including property assignments and JSON serialization formats.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 2, 2025

Walkthrough

A new suite of unit tests was added for the Speak and SpeakProviderConfig classes to verify both legacy and new multi-provider configurations. The Speak record was extended to support multiple TTS providers through a new SpeakProviders property and a new SpeakProviderConfig record, with updated serialization logic. The README was updated to document the new multi-provider configuration option.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
Deepgram/Models/Agent/v2/WebSocket/Speak.cs Added SpeakProviders property and SpeakProviderConfig record; updated ToString() for JSON serialization.
Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/AgentSpeakTests.cs Introduced comprehensive unit tests for Speak and SpeakProviderConfig, covering both single and multi-provider modes.
README.md Added documentation and example for multi-provider speech synthesis configuration; improved formatting in Integration Tests and Examples sections.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Test as Unit Test
    participant Speak as Speak
    participant Config as SpeakProviderConfig

    Test->>Speak: Create Speak (single or multi-provider)
    alt Single provider
        Speak->>Test: Expose Provider, Endpoint
        Test->>Speak: Call ToString()
        Speak->>Test: Return single-provider JSON
    else Multi-provider
        Speak->>Config: Create SpeakProviderConfig (for each provider)
        Config->>Speak: Return to SpeakProviders list
        Speak->>Test: Expose SpeakProviders
        Test->>Speak: Call ToString()
        Speak->>Test: Return multi-provider JSON
    end
Loading

Possibly related PRs

  • feat: make provider objects generic #374: Adds comprehensive unit tests for the new multi-provider Speak and SpeakProviderConfig classes, directly extending and testing the code changes introduced in this PR.

Suggested reviewers

  • deepgram-kiley

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 585e051 and 350f501.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (3 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • README.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: test (8.0.x)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
  • Create PR with Unit Tests
  • Post Copyable Unit Tests in a Comment
  • Commit Unit Tests in branch feat/agent-fallbacks-2

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jpvajda jpvajda requested a review from lukeocodes July 2, 2025 23:55
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
Deepgram/Models/Agent/v2/WebSocket/Speak.cs (1)

20-24: Endpoint property documentation could be more concise.

The documentation comment is overly verbose and could be simplified while maintaining clarity.

Consider simplifying the documentation:

-    /// Custom endpoint for custom models - to use a custom model, set provider.type to the flavour of API you are using (e.g. open_ai for OpenAI-like APIs).
-    /// Note: This is for backward compatibility with single provider format.
+    /// Custom endpoint for custom models. For backward compatibility with single provider format.
Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/AgentSpeakTests.cs (2)

16-19: Empty Setup method should be removed.

The Setup method is empty and serves no purpose. Consider removing it to reduce code clutter.

-    [SetUp]
-    public void Setup()
-    {
-    }

1-311: Consider adding edge case tests.

The test suite is comprehensive but could benefit from additional edge case scenarios:

  • Empty SpeakProviders list behavior
  • Null provider handling
  • Invalid JSON structure scenarios
  • Large provider arrays

Consider adding these test cases to improve coverage:

[Test]
public void Speak_EmptyProvidersList_Should_Handle_Gracefully()
{
    var speak = new Speak
    {
        SpeakProviders = new List<SpeakProviderConfig>()
    };
    
    var result = speak.ToString();
    result.Should().NotBeNull();
    
    var parsed = JsonDocument.Parse(result);
    parsed.RootElement.GetProperty("speak").GetArrayLength().Should().Be(0);
}

[Test]
public void SpeakProviderConfig_WithNullEndpoint_Should_Serialize_Correctly()
{
    var provider = new Provider();
    provider.Type = "deepgram";
    
    var config = new SpeakProviderConfig
    {
        Provider = provider,
        Endpoint = null
    };
    
    var result = config.ToString();
    var parsed = JsonDocument.Parse(result);
    parsed.RootElement.TryGetProperty("endpoint", out _).Should().BeFalse();
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c174175 and 585e051.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/AgentSpeakTests.cs (1 hunks)
  • Deepgram/Models/Agent/v2/WebSocket/Speak.cs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (3)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: dvonthenen
PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#253
File: Deepgram.Dev.sln:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-10-09T02:19:48.728Z
Learning: References to "Prerecorded" and other project names in the documentation and build scripts have been updated as part of the PR changes. Remaining mentions of "Prerecorded" in `Deepgram/README.md`, `examples/README.md`, and `README.md` were noted for potential review.
Learnt from: dvonthenen
PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#253
File: Deepgram.Dev.sln:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-07-29T07:02:00.905Z
Learning: References to "Prerecorded" and other project names in the documentation and build scripts have been updated as part of the PR changes. Remaining mentions of "Prerecorded" in `Deepgram/README.md`, `examples/README.md`, and `README.md` were noted for potential review.
Learnt from: dvonthenen
PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#345
File: Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakWebSocketClient.cs:49-49
Timestamp: 2024-10-28T19:43:32.373Z
Learning: In the 'deepgram-dotnet-sdk' project, existing documentation bugs will be addressed in a later pass, so minor documentation issues in code comments may be deferred during code reviews.
Learnt from: dvonthenen
PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#345
File: Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakWebSocketClient.cs:106-107
Timestamp: 2024-10-28T18:22:59.455Z
Learning: In `Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakWebSocketClient.cs`, commented-out methods related to binary send, such as `SpeakWithStream`, `SendBinary`, and `SendBinaryImmediately`, are intentionally left in the code to indicate that binary send is not currently supported.
Learnt from: dvonthenen
PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#347
File: Deepgram/ClientFactory.cs:210-261
Timestamp: 2024-11-01T16:16:34.733Z
Learning: In `Deepgram/ClientFactory.cs`, the deprecated methods `CreateSpeakClient`, `CreatePreRecordedClient`, and `CreateOnPremClient` are intentionally retained for backward compatibility and should not be suggested for removal in code reviews.
Deepgram/Models/Agent/v2/WebSocket/Speak.cs (10)
Learnt from: dvonthenen
PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#345
File: Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakWebSocketClient.cs:106-107
Timestamp: 2024-10-28T18:22:59.455Z
Learning: In `Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakWebSocketClient.cs`, commented-out methods related to binary send, such as `SpeakWithStream`, `SendBinary`, and `SendBinaryImmediately`, are intentionally left in the code to indicate that binary send is not currently supported.
Learnt from: dvonthenen
PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#309
File: Deepgram/Models/Speak/v1/WebSocket/v1/CommandSource.cs:7-22
Timestamp: 2024-10-09T02:19:46.087Z
Learning: The `Type` property in the `CommandSource` class within `Deepgram.Models.Speak.v1.WebSocket` can be dynamically initialized based on implementation requirements.
Learnt from: dvonthenen
PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#309
File: Deepgram/Models/Speak/v1/WebSocket/v1/CommandSource.cs:7-22
Timestamp: 2024-06-28T17:40:53.347Z
Learning: The `Type` property in the `CommandSource` class within `Deepgram.Models.Speak.v1.WebSocket` can be dynamically initialized based on implementation requirements.
Learnt from: dvonthenen
PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#347
File: Deepgram/ClientFactory.cs:210-261
Timestamp: 2024-11-01T16:16:34.733Z
Learning: In `Deepgram/ClientFactory.cs`, the deprecated methods `CreateSpeakClient`, `CreatePreRecordedClient`, and `CreateOnPremClient` are intentionally retained for backward compatibility and should not be suggested for removal in code reviews.
Learnt from: dvonthenen
PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#309
File: Deepgram/Models/Speak/v1/SyncResponse.cs:7-18
Timestamp: 2024-06-28T17:38:05.314Z
Learning: User dvonthenen has intentionally kept the deprecated `SyncResponse` class in the `Deepgram.Models.Speak.v1` namespace to allow users a transition period without needing to immediately switch to the new `Deepgram.Models.Speak.v1.REST.SyncResponse`.
Learnt from: dvonthenen
PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#345
File: Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakWebSocketClient.cs:85-85
Timestamp: 2024-10-28T18:23:10.963Z
Learning: In the `ISpeakWebSocketClient` interface, the method `SpeakWithText(string data)` is intentionally named and should not be renamed.
Learnt from: dvonthenen
PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#345
File: Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Average.cs:26-29
Timestamp: 2024-10-28T18:04:20.601Z
Learning: In `Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Average.cs`, it's acceptable to let exceptions in the `ToString()` method surface to the top when the method is mainly used for debugging.
Learnt from: dvonthenen
PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#309
File: Deepgram/Models/Speak/v1/AsyncResponse.cs:7-18
Timestamp: 2024-06-28T17:42:39.521Z
Learning: User dvonthenen has intentionally kept the deprecated `AsyncResponse` class in the `Deepgram.Models.Speak.v1` namespace to allow users a transition period without needing to immediately switch to the new `Deepgram.Models.Speak.v1.REST.AsyncResponse`.
Learnt from: dvonthenen
PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#309
File: Deepgram/Models/Speak/v1/AsyncResponse.cs:7-18
Timestamp: 2024-10-09T02:19:46.086Z
Learning: User dvonthenen has intentionally kept the deprecated `AsyncResponse` class in the `Deepgram.Models.Speak.v1` namespace to allow users a transition period without needing to immediately switch to the new `Deepgram.Models.Speak.v1.REST.AsyncResponse`.
Learnt from: dvonthenen
PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#336
File: Deepgram/Models/Analyze/v1/TextSource.cs:9-14
Timestamp: 2024-09-27T14:19:19.336Z
Learning: In the `TextSource` class of the Deepgram .NET SDK, the `Text` property can remain mutable as per the user's preference.
Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/AgentSpeakTests.cs (11)
Learnt from: dvonthenen
PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#347
File: Deepgram/ClientFactory.cs:210-261
Timestamp: 2024-11-01T16:16:34.733Z
Learning: In `Deepgram/ClientFactory.cs`, the deprecated methods `CreateSpeakClient`, `CreatePreRecordedClient`, and `CreateOnPremClient` are intentionally retained for backward compatibility and should not be suggested for removal in code reviews.
Learnt from: dvonthenen
PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#345
File: Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakWebSocketClient.cs:106-107
Timestamp: 2024-10-28T18:22:59.455Z
Learning: In `Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakWebSocketClient.cs`, commented-out methods related to binary send, such as `SpeakWithStream`, `SendBinary`, and `SendBinaryImmediately`, are intentionally left in the code to indicate that binary send is not currently supported.
Learnt from: dvonthenen
PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#350
File: Deepgram/Models/Authenticate/v1/DeepgramHttpClientOptions.cs:103-106
Timestamp: 2024-11-04T16:22:15.635Z
Learning: In `DeepgramHttpClientOptions.cs`, when suggesting changes to `ApiKey` initialization logic, ensure that setting `ApiKey` via the property before the constructor runs is properly handled to avoid introducing bugs.
Learnt from: dvonthenen
PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-07-29T07:02:00.905Z
Learning: The Deepgram .NET SDK examples are designed to be self-contained to facilitate ease of understanding and use. Centralizing functionalities like JSON parsing options among various examples is not preferred.
Learnt from: dvonthenen
PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-07-29T07:02:00.905Z
Learning: The Deepgram .NET SDK examples are designed to be self-contained, without centralizing elements like JSON parsing options among various examples. This design choice aims to make each example easily understandable and runnable on its own.
Learnt from: dvonthenen
PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#309
File: Deepgram/Models/Speak/v1/WebSocket/v1/CommandSource.cs:7-22
Timestamp: 2024-10-09T02:19:46.087Z
Learning: The `Type` property in the `CommandSource` class within `Deepgram.Models.Speak.v1.WebSocket` can be dynamically initialized based on implementation requirements.
Learnt from: dvonthenen
PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#309
File: Deepgram/Models/Speak/v1/WebSocket/v1/CommandSource.cs:7-22
Timestamp: 2024-06-28T17:40:53.347Z
Learning: The `Type` property in the `CommandSource` class within `Deepgram.Models.Speak.v1.WebSocket` can be dynamically initialized based on implementation requirements.
Learnt from: dvonthenen
PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-07-29T07:02:00.905Z
Learning: The Deepgram .NET SDK examples are designed to be self-contained, with a preference against centralizing JSON parsing options among various examples to ensure each example is easily understandable and runnable on its own.
Learnt from: dvonthenen
PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#345
File: Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/ResultResponse.cs:79-85
Timestamp: 2024-10-28T18:10:11.373Z
Learning: In the Deepgram .NET SDK, when implementing `ToString()` methods in model classes (e.g., `ResultResponse.cs` in `Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket`), it's acceptable to let exceptions bubble up when these methods are primarily used in debug messages.
Learnt from: dvonthenen
PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#343
File: examples/text-to-speech/websocket/simple/Program.cs:47-108
Timestamp: 2024-10-23T17:23:51.386Z
Learning: Example code in `examples/text-to-speech/websocket/simple/Program.cs` is intended to be simple and does not need to be fully optimized or perfect.
Learnt from: dvonthenen
PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#345
File: Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Average.cs:26-29
Timestamp: 2024-10-28T18:04:20.601Z
Learning: In `Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Average.cs`, it's acceptable to let exceptions in the `ToString()` method surface to the top when the method is mainly used for debugging.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
Deepgram/Models/Agent/v2/WebSocket/Speak.cs (2)
Deepgram/Models/Agent/v2/WebSocket/Provider.cs (2)
  • Provider (9-68)
  • ToString (64-67)
Deepgram/Utilities/JsonSerializeOptions.cs (1)
  • JsonSerializeOptions (7-13)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
Deepgram/Models/Agent/v2/WebSocket/Speak.cs (4)

11-12: Documentation accurately describes backward compatibility approach.

The updated documentation clearly explains the backward compatibility strategy and guides users on when to use the new SpeakProviders property.


26-33: Clear documentation for the new array format feature.

The documentation comprehensively explains the new SpeakProviders property, its precedence over single provider properties, and the intended use case.


38-41: ToString() implementation follows established pattern.

The ToString() override is consistent with the pattern used throughout the codebase, as shown in the relevant code snippets. It properly uses JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions and Regex.Unescape for consistent serialization.


44-70: SpeakProviderConfig record is well-structured and consistent.

The new record follows the same design patterns as the parent Speak record, with appropriate JSON attributes, documentation, and ToString() implementation. The structure supports the array format requirements effectively.

Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/AgentSpeakTests.cs (8)

23-50: Comprehensive backward compatibility test.

The test effectively verifies that single provider configuration works as expected and maintains backward compatibility. The assertions properly validate both the Provider and Endpoint properties while ensuring SpeakProviders remains null.


52-78: Effective JSON serialization validation.

The test verifies that the ToString() method produces valid JSON and contains expected properties. The JSON parsing validation ensures the serialization works correctly.


84-120: Thorough array format testing.

The test properly validates the new multi-provider array format, checking both the structure and content of the SpeakProviders list. The assertions verify different provider types and endpoint configurations.


122-158: Robust array JSON serialization test.

The test validates that the array format serializes correctly to JSON, including proper array structure verification. The JsonDocument parsing ensures the output matches expected format.


160-187: Complete SpeakProviderConfig structure validation.

The test comprehensively validates the new SpeakProviderConfig record, ensuring all properties are correctly set and accessible.


189-221: Effective SpeakProviderConfig JSON serialization test.

The test validates that individual SpeakProviderConfig instances serialize correctly to JSON, with proper JSON parsing verification.


227-278: Comprehensive array format JSON structure validation.

The test verifies that the complete array format serializes correctly and matches the expected JSON structure. The detailed assertions ensure proper nesting and property values.


280-308: Effective single provider format validation.

The test ensures that when using single provider format, the JSON output excludes the array property and maintains the expected structure. The negative assertion for the "speak" property name is particularly valuable.

@jpvajda
Copy link
Contributor Author

jpvajda commented Jul 3, 2025

i did a local test app and this checks out. ✅

Perfect! 🎉 The test application ran successfully and all tests passed. Let me summarize what we've accomplished:

✅ Test Results Summary

All Tests Completed Successfully! The speak provider options functionality works correctly with:

1. Single Provider Format (Backward Compatibility)

  • Deepgram: Correctly serializes with type: "deepgram" and custom model
  • OpenAI: Properly includes endpoint configuration with authorization headers

2. Array Provider Format (New Multi-Provider Support)

  • Multiple Providers: Successfully creates array with Deepgram + OpenAI fallback
  • Custom Endpoints: Correctly handles OpenAI endpoint configuration
  • Precedence Logic: Array format properly takes precedence over single provider

3. WebSocket Integration

  • Mocked Connections: Successfully mocks IAgentWebSocketClient for testing
  • Settings Transmission: Verifies SettingsSchema is properly serialized and sent
  • Dynamic Properties: Handles arbitrary properties like arbitrary_key: "test-value"

4. JSON Serialization

  • Valid JSON: All configurations produce valid, well-formatted JSON
  • Proper Structure: Maintains correct Agent API format
  • Configuration Integrity: All scenarios verified for structural correctness

🔧 What This Test Proves

  1. Beyond Unit Tests: The functionality works in a realistic scenario with actual settings
  2. WebSocket Ready: Can be integrated with real Agent WebSocket connections
  3. API Compatible: Generates JSON that matches Deepgram Agent API expectations
  4. Flexible Configuration: Supports both simple and complex provider setups
  5. Fallback Support: Multiple providers work for enhanced reliability

🧹 Cleanup

Future Steps: After testing completes, we can clean up the temp-test directory since it won't be committed to the repository. The test successfully validates that the speak provider options code works correctly beyond the existing unit tests.

The speak provider functionality is working perfectly! ✨

@jpvajda jpvajda requested a review from naomi-lgbt July 10, 2025 13:18
Copy link
Contributor

@lukeocodes lukeocodes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is great! Approved

@jpvajda jpvajda merged commit 3ea1da9 into main Jul 11, 2025
3 checks passed
@jpvajda jpvajda deleted the feat/agent-fallbacks-2 branch July 11, 2025 15:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants