-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 1.1k
Disable pull-progress-timeout per default #9130
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Disable pull-progress-timeout per default #9130
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: saschagrunert The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Follow-up on cri-o#9108 and multiple requests to disable the timeout per default. Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <[email protected]>
b735eed to
44d9073
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #9130 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 47.02% 47.02%
=======================================
Files 161 161
Lines 23617 23617
=======================================
Hits 11105 11105
Misses 11414 11414
Partials 1098 1098 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
/retest |
|
/retest |
|
/cherry-pick release-1.32 |
|
@saschagrunert: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/override ci/prow/ci-e2e-evented-pleg |
|
@saschagrunert: Overrode contexts on behalf of saschagrunert: ci/prow/ci-e2e-evented-pleg In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/retest |
3 similar comments
|
/retest |
|
/retest |
|
/retest |
|
/override ci/prow/ci-fedora-kata |
|
@saschagrunert: Overrode contexts on behalf of saschagrunert: ci/prow/ci-fedora-kata In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn |
|
@saschagrunert: Overrode contexts on behalf of saschagrunert: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@saschagrunert: #9130 failed to apply on top of branch "release-1.32": In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@saschagrunert: #9130 failed to apply on top of branch "release-1.31": In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@saschagrunert: #9130 failed to apply on top of branch "release-1.30": In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@saschagrunert: #9130 failed to apply on top of branch "release-1.29": In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind api-change
What this PR does / why we need it:
Follow-up on #9108 and multiple requests to disable the timeout per default.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
None
Special notes for your reviewer:
None
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?