Skip to content

Conversation

@DimitriPapadopoulos
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

SIM110 Use `return any(...)` instead of `for` loop
SIM118 Use `key in dict` instead of `key in dict.keys()`
SIM211 Use `not ...` instead of `False if ... else True`
SIM401 Use `.get(..., ...)` instead of an `if` block
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.33%. Comparing base (d6d726e) to head (cb5e270).
Report is 30 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #913      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   69.35%   69.33%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          86       86              
  Lines        8472     8466       -6     
  Branches     1058     1056       -2     
==========================================
- Hits         5876     5870       -6     
  Misses       2373     2373              
  Partials      223      223              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@effigies effigies merged commit 21d5af6 into nipreps:master Mar 1, 2025
19 checks passed
@DimitriPapadopoulos DimitriPapadopoulos deleted the SIM branch March 2, 2025 13:23
effigies added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2025
1.13.0 (March 20, 2025)

New feature release in the 1.13.x series.

This release restructures the ANTs brain extraction workflow.
This should be a backwards compatible change, but a minor release is used out of caution.

* FIX: Remove duplicated code, problematic deviation from antsBrainExtraction (#931)
* FIX: Listify numbers (#925)
* ENH: Allow + symbol in label entities (#926, #927)
* STY: Apply various ruff checks (#913, #915, #917, #918, #919, #930)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants