Skip to content

handle multiple DOIs #1496

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 3, 2024
Merged

handle multiple DOIs #1496

merged 5 commits into from
May 3, 2024

Conversation

@maxulysse
Copy link
Member

Replace half of #1494

PR checklist

  • This comment contains a description of changes (with reason).
  • If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
  • If you've added a new tool - have you followed the pipeline conventions in the contribution docs
  • If necessary, also make a PR on the nf-core/sarek branch on the nf-core/test-datasets repository.
  • Make sure your code lints (nf-core lint).
  • Ensure the test suite passes (nf-test test tests/ --verbose --profile +docker).
  • Check for unexpected warnings in debug mode (nextflow run . -profile debug,test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).
  • Usage Documentation in docs/usage.md is updated.
  • Output Documentation in docs/output.md is updated.
  • CHANGELOG.md is updated.
  • README.md is updated (including new tool citations and authors/contributors).

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 2, 2024 •
edited
Loading

nf-core lint overall result: Passed ✅ ⚠️

Posted for pipeline commit 28e6b22

+| ✅ 181 tests passed       |+
#| ❔  14 tests were ignored |#
!| ❗   3 tests had warnings |!

❗ Test warnings:

  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in main.nf: Optionally add in-text citation tools to this list.
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in main.nf: Optionally add bibliographic entries to this list.
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in main.nf: Only uncomment below if logic in toolCitationText/toolBibliographyText has been filled!

❔ Tests ignored:

  • files_exist - File is ignored: .github/workflows/awsfulltest.yml
  • files_exist - File is ignored: .github/workflows/awstest.yml
  • files_exist - File is ignored: conf/modules.config
  • files_exist - File is ignored: lib/WorkflowMain.groovy
  • files_exist - File is ignored: lib/NfcoreTemplate.groovy
  • files_exist - File is ignored: lib/WorkflowSarek.groovy
  • files_unchanged - File ignored due to lint config: .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
  • files_unchanged - File ignored due to lint config: assets/nf-core-sarek_logo_light.png
  • files_unchanged - File ignored due to lint config: docs/images/nf-core-sarek_logo_light.png
  • files_unchanged - File ignored due to lint config: docs/images/nf-core-sarek_logo_dark.png
  • files_unchanged - File ignored due to lint config: .gitignore or .prettierignore or pyproject.toml
  • actions_ci - actions_ci
  • actions_awstest - 'awstest.yml' workflow not found: /home/runner/work/sarek/sarek/.github/workflows/awstest.yml
  • template_strings - template_strings

✅ Tests passed:

Run details

  • nf-core/tools version 2.13.1
  • Run at 2024-05-03 11:13:36

@maxulysse
Copy link
Member Author

waiting on nf-core/modules#5556 as well

@maxulysse maxulysse mentioned this pull request May 2, 2024
Merged
4 tasks
@maxulysse maxulysse changed the title handle multiple DOI handle multiple DOIs May 2, 2024
jasmezz
jasmezz previously approved these changes May 3, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@jasmezz jasmezz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM from what I understand from the string-replacing syntax. If you prefer a really close check of those lines in the main.nf, you should wait for another review. But comparing those to the nf-core subworkflow update and your changed code, it looks alright to me ;)

@maxulysse maxulysse merged commit 1eae2e3 into nf-core:dev May 3, 2024
@maxulysse maxulysse deleted the multiple_DOI branch May 3, 2024 11:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jasmezz jasmezz jasmezz approved these changes

@FriederikeHanssen FriederikeHanssen Awaiting requested review from FriederikeHanssen FriederikeHanssen is a code owner

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@maxulysse @jasmezz