Skip to content

Conversation

@bobzhang
Copy link
Contributor

@bobzhang bobzhang commented Oct 9, 2025

No description provided.

@peter-jerry-ye-code-review
Copy link

Duplicate code in review functionality across two scripts

Category
Maintainability
Code Snippet
scripts/list-mbti-files.mjs (lines 104-150) and scripts/review-mbti-files.mjs (lines 132-180) contain nearly identical reviewMbtiFile and saveReviewToFile functions
Recommendation
Extract the common review functionality into a shared module (e.g., scripts/lib/review-utils.mjs) and import it in both scripts to eliminate code duplication
Reasoning
Code duplication makes maintenance harder and increases the risk of bugs when changes need to be made to the review logic

Potential memory issues with large file processing

Category
Performance
Code Snippet
scripts/review-mbti-files.mjs:144 and scripts/list-mbti-files.mjs:121 - const content = await readFile(filePath, 'utf-8')
Recommendation
Add file size checks before reading and consider streaming for very large files, or set reasonable limits (e.g., max 1MB per file)
Reasoning
Reading all .mbti files into memory simultaneously during concurrent processing could cause memory issues for large codebases

Inconsistent error handling between concurrent operations

Category
Correctness
Code Snippet
scripts/review-mbti-files.mjs:195-220 - Promise.race() error handling doesn't distinguish between network errors and processing errors
Recommendation
Implement retry logic for transient network errors and better error categorization to handle different failure modes appropriately
Reasoning
Current error handling treats all failures the same way, which may cause unnecessary failures for temporary network issues

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1477

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 89.199%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 1476: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 9307
Relevant Lines: 10434

💛 - Coveralls

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants