Skip to content

Conversation

@sunishsheth2009
Copy link
Collaborator

What changes are proposed in this pull request?

Moving back model_uri to predict

How is this patch tested?

  • Test passes

Does this PR change the documentation?

  • No. You can skip the rest of this section.
  • Yes. Make sure the changed pages / sections render correctly in the documentation preview.

Release Notes

Is this a user-facing change?

  • No. You can skip the rest of this section.
  • Yes. Give a description of this change to be included in the release notes for MLflow users.

(Details in 1-2 sentences. You can just refer to another PR with a description if this PR is part of a larger change.)

What component(s), interfaces, languages, and integrations does this PR affect?

Components

  • area/artifacts: Artifact stores and artifact logging
  • area/build: Build and test infrastructure for MLflow
  • area/docs: MLflow documentation pages
  • area/examples: Example code
  • area/model-registry: Model Registry service, APIs, and the fluent client calls for Model Registry
  • area/models: MLmodel format, model serialization/deserialization, flavors
  • area/pipelines: Pipelines, Pipeline APIs, Pipeline configs, Pipeline Templates
  • area/projects: MLproject format, project running backends
  • area/scoring: MLflow Model server, model deployment tools, Spark UDFs
  • area/server-infra: MLflow Tracking server backend
  • area/tracking: Tracking Service, tracking client APIs, autologging

Interface

  • area/uiux: Front-end, user experience, plotting, JavaScript, JavaScript dev server
  • area/docker: Docker use across MLflow's components, such as MLflow Projects and MLflow Models
  • area/sqlalchemy: Use of SQLAlchemy in the Tracking Service or Model Registry
  • area/windows: Windows support

Language

  • language/r: R APIs and clients
  • language/java: Java APIs and clients
  • language/new: Proposals for new client languages

Integrations

  • integrations/azure: Azure and Azure ML integrations
  • integrations/sagemaker: SageMaker integrations
  • integrations/databricks: Databricks integrations

How should the PR be classified in the release notes? Choose one:

  • rn/breaking-change - The PR will be mentioned in the "Breaking Changes" section
  • rn/none - No description will be included. The PR will be mentioned only by the PR number in the "Small Bugfixes and Documentation Updates" section
  • rn/feature - A new user-facing feature worth mentioning in the release notes
  • rn/bug-fix - A user-facing bug fix worth mentioning in the release notes
  • rn/documentation - A user-facing documentation change worth mentioning in the release notes

@github-actions github-actions bot added area/recipes MLflow Recipes, Recipes APIs, Recipes configs, Recipe Templates rn/none List under Small Changes in Changelogs. labels Oct 31, 2022
@mlflow-automation
Copy link
Contributor

mlflow-automation commented Oct 31, 2022

Documentation preview will be available here.

Notes
  • Ignore this comment if this PR does not change the documentation.
  • It takes a few minutes for the preview to be available.
  • The preview is updated on every commit to this PR.
  • Job URL: https://circleci.com/gh/mlflow/mlflow/34958
  • Updated at: 2022-10-31 17:22:10.112282

@sunishsheth2009 sunishsheth2009 merged commit db7906a into master Oct 31, 2022
@sunishsheth2009 sunishsheth2009 deleted the sunish-pipeline-2.0 branch October 31, 2022 19:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/recipes MLflow Recipes, Recipes APIs, Recipes configs, Recipe Templates rn/none List under Small Changes in Changelogs.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants