-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 65
Quarantine redacted media #593
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Your points 3 and 4 are slightly concerning to me - I am wondering if it makes sense to have this functionality behind a flag of some sort so it isn't the default, and is rather something that mods can opt in and out of given the circumstances? |
Ack. This now only runs explicitly, except for the NSFW protection which has an optional setting for automatics. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Generally looks great, thanks for doing this! I just noted a few things, and was wondering if you'd be willing to add tests for the new QuarantineMedia command.
|
This looks broadly good to me, thanks for taking it on! Looks like one of the new tests is failing though: Otherwise I think this is good to go. |
This adds a new flag
--quarantineto some commands that redact.Issues:
There may be a light DOS thing here where innocent media could be included in an event (e.g. user avatars) that then becomes quarantined as a result.We now only run when the user requests it to, reducing this.