Skip to content

Conversation

@elf-alchemist
Copy link

Fixes #36
Early attempt at fixing a poor Graf implementation and better matching the MBF21 spec. I've not been able to consistently test this PR properly, while E2M7's step-up crates in the northeast corner of the map aren't blocking the player, I've not yet consistently reproduced a scenario that actually marks them as player-blocking. I'll test further, soon.

@elf-alchemist elf-alchemist changed the title Fix "NoMBFf21" behavior Fix "NoMBF21" behavior Oct 17, 2025
@Boondorl
Copy link
Contributor

Just a heads up, the language file itself shouldn't be changed. Historically this was done through Graf's spreadsheet on Google and then pulled in later, but we'll be looking into different options for the future. For now you can ignore it

@TehRealSalt TehRealSalt added bug/bugfix Something isn't working compat bug related to compatibility with other ports or older versions of uz/gz/zdoom labels Oct 17, 2025
{ "comp_stairs", &dsda_options::comp_stairs, 0, 1 },
{ "comp_ledgeblock", &dsda_options::comp_ledgeblock, 0, 1 },
{ "comp_friendlyspawn", &dsda_options::comp_friendlyspawn, 0, 1 },
{ "comp_reservedlineflag", &dsda_options::comp_friendlyspawn, 0, 1 },

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why do I feel like this is just an oversight?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug/bugfix Something isn't working compat bug related to compatibility with other ports or older versions of uz/gz/zdoom

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Remove nombf21 behavior in favor of matching comp_reservedlineflag

4 participants