refactor: rename particles argument to particle_db #50
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This naming was introduced for check_reaction_violations (#40) and makes more sense to the reader
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #50 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 94.23% 94.23%
=======================================
Files 14 14
Lines 2843 2843
=======================================
Hits 2679 2679
Misses 164 164
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
redeboer
pushed a commit
to redeboer/ComPWA-qrules
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2022
BREAKING CHANGE: python API changes. * Change DataSet structure (from ComPWA). * Also fix all form factor related issues.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rename
particlesargument in several functions toparticle_db. This naming was introduced forcheck_reaction_violations(#40) and makes more sense to the reader.