Skip to content

Conversation

Yangqing
Copy link
Member

This is a PR to address the comments at #1170.

@longjon
Copy link
Contributor

longjon commented Sep 28, 2014

Looks good, except shall we preserve the fallback warning at layer creation time? (I guess if the engine is specified as DEFAULT, we don't really need to warn, but if it's explicitly CUDNN, we probably should say something.)

@Yangqing
Copy link
Member Author

Done. I made it LOG(INFO) since it is not a crucial issue.

@Yangqing
Copy link
Member Author

@sguada Sergio if this looks good to you I'll merge and close the other PR.

@sguada
Copy link
Contributor

sguada commented Sep 29, 2014

@Yangqing looks good to me

Yangqing added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2014
@Yangqing Yangqing merged commit 02d4850 into BVLC:dev Sep 29, 2014
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This does not compile for me,

This does:
CHECK_EQ(this->pad_h_, 0);

@ducha-aiki
Copy link
Contributor

Now this commit fails tests:
...
[ RUN ] CuDNNPoolingLayerTest/1.TestSetupPaddedCuDNN
F0929 16:18:15.497092 13521 cudnn_pooling_layer.cpp:17] Check failed: this->pad_h_ == 0 (1 vs. 0)

longjon added a commit to longjon/caffe that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2014
After BVLC#1172, some cuDNN pooling layer tests were failing due to use of
padding. (Before BVLC#1172, these tests were actually testing PoolingLayer
instead of CuDNNPoolingLayer via the fallback.) This commit disables
many tests via commenting, so that they can be easily readded when cuDNN
gains pooling padding support.
@longjon longjon mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2014
mitmul pushed a commit to mitmul/caffe that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2014
mitmul pushed a commit to mitmul/caffe that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2014
After BVLC#1172, some cuDNN pooling layer tests were failing due to use of
padding. (Before BVLC#1172, these tests were actually testing PoolingLayer
instead of CuDNNPoolingLayer via the fallback.) This commit disables
many tests via commenting, so that they can be easily readded when cuDNN
gains pooling padding support.
RazvanRanca pushed a commit to RazvanRanca/caffe that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2014
RazvanRanca pushed a commit to RazvanRanca/caffe that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2014
After BVLC#1172, some cuDNN pooling layer tests were failing due to use of
padding. (Before BVLC#1172, these tests were actually testing PoolingLayer
instead of CuDNNPoolingLayer via the fallback.) This commit disables
many tests via commenting, so that they can be easily readded when cuDNN
gains pooling padding support.
cbfinn pushed a commit to cbfinn/caffe that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2015
After BVLC#1172, some cuDNN pooling layer tests were failing due to use of
padding. (Before BVLC#1172, these tests were actually testing PoolingLayer
instead of CuDNNPoolingLayer via the fallback.) This commit disables
many tests via commenting, so that they can be easily readded when cuDNN
gains pooling padding support.
slayton58 pushed a commit to slayton58/caffe that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2015
After BVLC#1172, some cuDNN pooling layer tests were failing due to use of
padding. (Before BVLC#1172, these tests were actually testing PoolingLayer
instead of CuDNNPoolingLayer via the fallback.) This commit disables
many tests via commenting, so that they can be easily readded when cuDNN
gains pooling padding support.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants