Skip to content

Conversation

cepiross
Copy link

@cepiross cepiross commented Jun 5, 2017

Since caffe library suffix introduces pycaffe trouble in cmake installation as described in #4314 (MacOS), suffix modification have to be specified.
This PR also considers the existing opencl/windows branch 2794c97 for compatibility.

cepiross and others added 15 commits June 14, 2016 19:00
* 'master' of https://github.com/cepiross/caffe:
  Fix pyCaffe installation on Cmake for MacOS

# Conflicts:
#	python/CMakeLists.txt
* 'master' of https://github.com/BVLC/caffe:
  upgrading Accuracy layer: (1) efficient CPU implementation O(L) for top_k, no need for fancy priority_queue etc. (2) GPU implementation
  [docs] fix link to `AbsVal` layer
  Fixed bilinear filler, added tests
  Packages needed by Ubuntu 16.04 also
  Expose GPU pointers to Python
  modified division operator for compatibility of python 3
  Update README.md
  Fix hardcode xcode path
  update deprecated pandas call
  update sklearn calls to use latest API
  Update lrn.md
  docs: add Ubuntu package tracker link in Ubuntu guide
  docs: update apt installation guide for Debian and Ubuntu
  Update README.md
  List branches in readme
Add absolute tolerance to test_net.py to prevent random Travis fails
…e_guide

Update link to google style guide.
Fix default mode warning in io.resize_image
Fixed bug where make distribute duplicates python files
fix web demo install instruction link
@Noiredd
Copy link
Member

Noiredd commented Nov 2, 2017

I have restarted the tests that failed prior to #5973, it passes now. Consider updating the PR by squashing your commits.

@cepiross
Copy link
Author

cepiross commented Nov 2, 2017

Since commits in this PR cannot be squashed due to merge commits in my master, I rebase my repo and create a branch to provide new PR.

@cepiross cepiross deleted the master branch December 1, 2017 20:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants