# Benchmarking wc

<!-- spell-checker:ignore (words) uuwc uucat largefile somefile Mshortlines moby lwcm cmds tablefmt -->

Much of what makes wc fast is avoiding unnecessary work. It has multiple strategies,
depending on which data is requested.

## Strategies

### Counting bytes

In the case of `wc -c` the content of the input doesn't have to be inspected at all,
only the size has to be known. That enables a few optimizations.

#### File size

If it can, wc reads the file size directly. This is not interesting to benchmark,
except to see if it still works. Try `wc -c largefile`.

#### `splice()`

On Linux `splice()` is used to get the input's length while discarding it directly.

The best way I've found to generate a fast input to test `splice()` is to pipe the
output of uutils `cat` into it. Note that GNU `cat` is slower and therefore less
suitable, and that if a file is given as its input directly (as in
`wc -c < largefile`) the first strategy kicks in. Try `uucat somefile | wc -c`.

### Counting lines and UTF-8 characters

If the flags set are a subset of `-clm` then the input doesn't have to be decoded. The
input is read in chunks and the `bytecount` crate is used to count the newlines (`-l` flag)
and/or UTF-8 characters (`-m` flag).

It's useful to vary the line length in the input. GNU wc seems particularly
bad at short lines.

### Processing unicode

This is the most general strategy, and it's necessary for counting words,
characters, and line lengths. Individual steps are still switched on and off
depending on what must be reported.

Try varying which of the `-w`, `-m`, `-l` and `-L` flags are used.
(The `-c` flag is unlikely to make a difference.)

Passing no flags is equivalent to passing `-wcl`. That case should perhaps be
given special attention as it's the default.

## Generating files

To generate a file with many very short lines, run
`yes | head -c50000000 > 25Mshortlines`.

To get a file with less artificial contents, download a book from
Project Gutenberg and concatenate it a lot of times:

```shell
curl https://www.gutenberg.org/files/2701/2701-0.txt -o moby.txt
cat moby.txt moby.txt moby.txt moby.txt > moby4.txt
cat moby4.txt moby4.txt moby4.txt moby4.txt > moby16.txt
cat moby16.txt moby16.txt moby16.txt moby16.txt > moby64.txt
```

And get one with lots of unicode too:

```shell
curl https://www.gutenberg.org/files/30613/30613-0.txt -o odyssey.txt
cat odyssey.txt odyssey.txt odyssey.txt odyssey.txt > odyssey4.txt
cat odyssey4.txt odyssey4.txt odyssey4.txt odyssey4.txt > odyssey16.txt
cat odyssey16.txt odyssey16.txt odyssey16.txt odyssey16.txt > odyssey64.txt
cat odyssey64.txt odyssey64.txt odyssey64.txt odyssey64.txt > odyssey256.txt
```

Finally, it's interesting to try a binary file. Look for one with
`du -sh /usr/bin/* | sort -h`. On my system `/usr/bin/docker` is a good
candidate as it's fairly large.

## Running benchmarks

Use [`hyperfine`](https://github.com/sharkdp/hyperfine) to compare the
performance. For example, `hyperfine 'wc somefile' 'uuwc somefile'`.

If you want to get fancy and exhaustive, generate a table:

|                         |   moby64.txt |   odyssey256.txt |   25Mshortlines |   /usr/bin/docker |
|-------------------------|--------------|------------------|-----------------|-------------------|
| `wc <FILE>`             |       1.3965 |           1.6182 |          5.2967 |            2.2294 |
| `wc -c <FILE>`          |       0.8134 |           1.2774 |          0.7732 |            0.9106 |
| `uucat <FILE> \| wc -c` |       2.7760 |           2.5565 |          2.3769 |            2.3982 |
| `wc -l <FILE>`          |       1.1441 |           1.2854 |          2.9681 |            1.1493 |
| `wc -L <FILE>`          |       2.1087 |           1.2551 |          5.4577 |            2.1490 |
| `wc -m <FILE>`          |       2.7272 |           2.1704 |          7.3371 |            3.4347 |
| `wc -w <FILE>`          |       1.9007 |           1.5206 |          4.7851 |            2.8529 |
| `wc -lwcmL <FILE>`      |       1.1687 |           0.9169 |          4.4092 |            2.0663 |

Beware that:

- Results are fuzzy and change from run to run
- You'll often want to check versions of uutils wc against each other instead
  of against GNU
- This takes a lot of time to generate
- This only shows the relative speedup, not the absolute time, which may be
  misleading if the time is very short

Created by the following Python script:

```python
import json
import subprocess

from tabulate import tabulate

bins = ["wc", "uuwc"]
files = ["moby64.txt", "odyssey256.txt", "25Mshortlines", "/usr/bin/docker"]
cmds = [
    "{cmd} {file}",
    "{cmd} -c {file}",
    "uucat {file} | {cmd} -c",
    "{cmd} -l {file}",
    "{cmd} -L {file}",
    "{cmd} -m {file}",
    "{cmd} -w {file}",
    "{cmd} -lwcmL {file}",
]

table = []
for cmd in cmds:
    row = ["`" + cmd.format(cmd="wc", file="<FILE>") + "`"]
    for file in files:
        subprocess.run(
            [
                "hyperfine",
                cmd.format(cmd=bins[0], file=file),
                cmd.format(cmd=bins[1], file=file),
                "--export-json=out.json",
            ],
            check=True,
        )
        with open("out.json") as f:
            res = json.load(f)["results"]
        row.append(round(res[0]["mean"] / res[1]["mean"], 4))
    table.append(row)
print(tabulate(table, [""] + files, tablefmt="github"))
```

(You may have to adjust the `bins` and `files` variables depending on your
setup, and please do add other interesting cases to `cmds`.)
