Skip to content

ChatGPT: The license is not what you are saying it is #192

@Zectbumo

Description

@Zectbumo

It seems you chose the wrong license for what you are asking for. I see you spent time on this:

Re-re-license from AGPLv3 to the weaker copyleft OSL-3.0.
After spending too much time researching licenses, my laymen
understanding makes me feel that OSL-3.0 will be a better match given
TrailBase's rare dual use as a standalone backend or framework.

It tried to outline the reasoning in the README.md. I would appreciate
input from anyone more experienced with licenses.
For now, I would like to turn my attention back to more technical issues
:hide:.

I asked GPT-5.2 for a license recommendation and it says:

Clear recommendation given their exact wording:
MPL-2.0 is the correct license.

OSL-3.0 overshoots and contradicts their intent.
LGPL is awkward for server/framework software.
AGPL directly violates their first sentence.

Check it out https://opensource.org/license/mpl-2-0

FWIW, I personally would like to see MIT but you have your reasons.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions