Skip to content

Conversation

@olix0r
Copy link
Member

@olix0r olix0r commented Mar 9, 2025

We include a group/version/kind for inbound server resources, but we do not indicate which specific port the server is applied to. This is important context to understand the inbound proxy's behavior, especially when using the default servers.

This change adds a srv_port label to inbound server metrics to definitively and consistently indicate the server port used for inbound policy.

This change also adds prometheus_client compatible label formatting for
consistency.

@olix0r olix0r requested a review from a team as a code owner March 9, 2025 18:39
@olix0r olix0r enabled auto-merge (squash) March 9, 2025 18:39
We include a group/version/kind for inbound server resources, but we do not
indicate which specific port the server is applied to. This is important context
to understand the inbound proxy's behavior, especially when using the default
servers.

This change adds a `srv_port` label to inbound server metrics to definitively
and consistently indicate the server port used for inbound policy.

This change also adds prometheus_client compatible label formatting for
consistency.
@olix0r olix0r merged commit fc928b6 into main Mar 10, 2025
15 checks passed
@olix0r olix0r deleted the ver/srv-port branch March 10, 2025 00:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants