Skip to content

Shouldn't FilmFacade constructor be package private? #7

@mkrzywanski

Description

@mkrzywanski

Just a simple question. Shouldn't FilmFacade constructor be defined as package private? Right now it is defined as public but client code cannot instantiate it with it because it's dependencies are package private so client code (for example in different package) cannot use it. It can be instantiated only by using Spring and having FilmConfiguration class scanned.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions