feat(binding): Add support for struct level validations #1147
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
29ca5d9 to
7d5af53
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1147 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 96.68% 96.68%
=======================================
Files 16 16
Lines 1721 1721
=======================================
Hits 1664 1664
Misses 49 49
Partials 8 8Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
7d5af53 to
a83eb4c
Compare
a83eb4c to
99656ba
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
validatorallows for struct level validation - https://github.com/go-playground/validator/releases/tag/v8.7. This adds a method,RegisterStructValidation, to theStructValidatorinterface and implements the same indefaultValidator. A test for the same has also present. I added an example but did not included the entire example in README.md. Not everybody would need this feature and the readme is already a bit large.